:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2409450-1456717405-2244.jpeg.jpg)
Posted on 02/07/2022 5:11:16 AM PST by Kaslin
The ongoing controversy involving podcast giant Joe Rogan and his Spotify platform is playing out like a soap opera and shows no sign of abating. Among those weighing in are music legends like Neil Young and Jon Mitchell, actors like Dwayne Johnson (aka “The Rock”) and Sharon Stone, and White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, on behalf of resident Biden himself.
What has become clear, though, in this larger debate about free speech and “misinformation” is that Rogan himself does not seem to be an ideologue. In other words, the very popular (and famously foul-mouthed) podcast host, comedian, and UFC commentator does not seem to be driving a particular cultural agenda. Instead, he seems to be more focused on having interesting conversations with a wide range of guests, learning for himself as he goes.
Contrast this with leftwing or rightwing radio hosts or leftwing or rightwing news networks. You know exactly what you’re getting when you tune in.
In contrast, Rogan has interviewed both pro-vax and anti-vax guests, as well as, more broadly, both liberals and conservatives, giving all of them space to talk freely, even if he pushes back or challenges them along the way.
But, from what I’ve read about his guests and from snippets of the shows I’ve seen, he is not on the air primarily to drive a particular political or cultural agenda.
Even when he came under attack from the left for using ivermectin and other drugs to treat his COVID, it didn’t appear that his goal was to challenge the mainstream narrative. Instead, his goal was to get better as quickly as possible, using drugs prescribed by his doctor.
The battle only began when he was maliciously slammed for using “horse dewormer.” That’s when he fought back.
But, to say it once more, this was not an ideological battle with the left and the right. This was Joe Rogan being himself, and that meant following the evidence where he thought it led.
And that, in turn, leads to my proposal.
Since Rogan’s podcast is front and center in the news today, and since he has a massive viewing and listening audience, why not use the show to host a debate/discussion between two of the most articulate voices on either side of the COVID-vaccination debate? Or perhaps even host several debates (at least two), allowing each side to present its case and respond to challenges.
The discussion is not the mandates, which are often opposed even by strong vaccination advocates. The discussion is about the safety or efficacy of the vaccines and the wisdom of our current health policies.
As far as recommendations, I’m not sure who the best advocates would be for each side. That’s because it’s not just a matter of having the requisite expertise. It’s also a matter of being able to articulate one’s views clearly as well as respond to challenges. Not everyone can do this well.
It’s also important that each advocate is well-known and/or respected. This way, it’s not a debate between a flyweight and a heavyweight. It should be a debate between equals.
That being said, perhaps a case could be made for bringing on the man whose viral interview helped spark the current controversy, namely, Dr. Robert Malone. Why not allow his COVID vaccination concerns to be challenged by a respected pro-vax professional? And, conversely, why not allow him to challenge a vaccination advocate face to face? With Rogan’s long-form interview format, there would be plenty of time for substantive interaction, with Rogan serving as the fair and interested moderator. Why not?
It is true that, in most cases, the results of a debate are not definitive, and there is always subjectivity involved. But having participated in scores of debates myself, I can say with certainty that weak spots do get exposed, that clear points are made, that minds are often changed, and that the audience generally finds the debates to be very helpful and educational.
At the very least, the general public gets to hear both sides together, making it much easier to evaluate the issues at hand.
So, how about it, Joe? And how about it Spotify? And how about it, everyone who loves free speech and believes in the open and public exchange of ideas rather than intimidation and deplatforming and boycotting and banning?
Someone will surely protest, “To debate an issue is to give credibility and exposure to the other side, and, in this case, the other side is not worthy.”
I reply, “It’s too late for that, since both sides are being discussed and debated every day of the week. Plus, these are potentially life and death issues. How can we not present our cases, side by side, for America (and the world) to hear?”
The bottom line is that if you’re confident you have the truth, you’re willing to bring it into the light. When you’re not confident, you’d rather hide in the darkness. Shall we bring everything into the light?
And to anyone reading this article who has any connection to Joe Rogan, see if you can get this proposal to him. If I knew him or anyone who close to him, I’d make this suggestion in private. But since that is not the case, I’m throwing in my two cents in public.
Let the debates begin!
Lesson here...NEVER APOLOGIZE TO THE LEFT! EVER!
Defund is turning into de-Educate the World.
As far as I can tell, Rogan likes to talk to just about anyone. More importantly: Rogan is happy to listen to just about anyone.
Rogan has all sorts of people on his show. He has his own opinions, sure, but Rogan is not really ideological. He’s just there to find interesting people to talk to.
Joe Rogan is a Liberal. The pro-mandate Authoritarians are leftist. The last thing Leftists want is a debate. Their goal is to shut down dissent, and if needed incarcerate all those who oppose them.
The LEFT will not debate. Joe Rogan will be unable to find anyone to debate Dr. Malone. I’ve been watching Joe’s podcasts & I predict that a debate won’t happen, even if Spotify wants it to.
Dr. Malone would welcome it. The Big Pharma / Big Government side would not. They are not interested in an honest debate.
Just like Rush, those voicing the strongest opposition have likely never listened in.
They might hear about cherry picked soundbytes here and there catefully crafted to create indignation in the intellectually lazy and the ignorant
Agreed...all it does is embolden them.
https://twitter.com/wokal_distance/status/1490242633230344192
Professional political hit job breakdown
patriottakes. And metidas touch connection. Dem superpacs
#ThanksJoeRogan
Jeez Michael - don’t you understand that when you present facts to a lib they simply put their fingers in their ears and scream “la la la la la la!!!
Why not allow his COVID vaccination concerns to be challenged by a respected pro-vax professional? And, conversely, why not allow him to challenge a vaccination advocate face to face?
—
Rogan’s show is a long-form interview format, not a debate format, which typically devolves into a shouting match.
Rogan has tried to get on proponents for the vaxx. They will rarely agree to come on. A few months ago Rogan had on Sanjay Gupta, and Gupta was traumatized by the three hour interview. People on the left are use to dictating policies, not defending them.
Since Rogan is a socialist leftist, he doesn’t know that apologies only work when the left likes what you are saying overall. Everything else is just blood in the water to them.
The left doesn’t want a debate. They want to have the platform to themselves.
The last time Joe Rogan had an actual debate, he had the head of Twitter and one of his minions on to debate Tim Pool (a high school dropout, btw).
Tim Pool wiped the floor with them. I haven’t seen a real debate on Rogan since then.
The show has been drifting right, because the left is wary of coming on the show, because Rogan asks follow up questions.
A NYT reporter was on the show and said some disparaging remarks about Tulsi Gabbard. Rogan, who had interviewed Gabbard, asked for specifics. The NYT reporter froze like a deer in the headlights. She had no evidence, she was just repeating what was flying around Twitter.
It’s a nice idea to have a debate, pro, and con on the Covid subject, but the truth is the pro-vaxers have no facts on their side so all you will get from them is name-calling. Matter of fact, the entire Covid saga (experiment) has the potential to destroy homo sapiens on planet earth. Get down on your knees on behalf of all humanity and plead for God’s saving grace.
https://noqreport.com/2022/02/07/micro-blood-clots/
I haven’t been paying close attention to the Rogan problem, and I’m not against tattoos except that they are so permanent, but with the total slathering of his forearms with tattoos I see him as an outlaw.
Should I not think that way? A person’s choice of outward look affects me.
What on earth are you talking about?
—”More importantly: Rogan is happy to listen to just about anyone.”
This is an attack by a swarm of insects.
No visible leader.
No names.
In fact, many probably do not exist.
That said, a large number of small stings can kill.
The puppet masters would like that.
The MSM, Big Tech and the Deep State fear Rogan because if he moves to another platform he will take his entire audience and thensome with him. And they won't just be rightwingers but others who might start listening to all the conservatives that had been previously cancelled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.