Posted on 02/04/2022 6:30:34 AM PST by 1Old Pro
Dr. Makary says prior Covid natural immunity more persistent t, up to 2 years (so far).
Here's the breaking news, natural immunity is 66% effective against Omicron. The vaccine is 60% to start and falls to 30%...kinda like a flu vaccine, effective but in the 40% range at best.
So natural immunity is SAFER and BETTER. These results in JAMA really need to be communicated with America. Watch the video interview with John Roberts.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Where is Fauci?? Seems like he disappeared. Would laugh if he has Covid.
Then when they need to inject more control over our lives they'll go back to telling us covid is more dangerous than Darth Vader menstruating.
If he did, I suspect he would lie and deceive, again. I'm sure he'll be back, he's addicted to attention like crack.
That was the first thing that jumped out at me. The jab is slightly more effected that the flue vaccine. But no where near the 70-80-90% they were telling us.
Its been clear natural immunity was better for a long time now. The study in Qatar last year was much more definitive. They tracked every known case of reinfection of the unjabbed in the country. Out of the gargantuan sample they had many mild cases. Only four hospitalzations....and ZERO deaths. That’s ZERO. The mortality rate for the unjabbed who manage to get reinfected was ZERO in a gigantic sample. Case fricken closed. Natural Immunity is not just better its all you need. Full stop.
Of course, but the thing is that government needs to STOP LYING about the "unvaccinated" being a danger to society. If they have natural immunity they are immunized better than those who just have the jab.
The vaccine is 60% to start and falls to 30%.
If I read the data, it is zero percent effective and made it worse.
Could be, we certainly have enough data by now to make all kinds of determinations. Yet the government just wants to deceive.
natural immunity = 66%
natural immunity + jab = 60% then lower
Thinking skills.
I wouldn’t go as far as saying Gold Standard. Granted they are coming around to what many here suspected 2 years ago. I guess better late than never. Just curious how much $$$$ they get from Fauci and Co. on an annual basis? They backed Fauci to the hilt for the first 18 months of this SCAM.
I've told this before here on FR, and this seems like a great thread to do so again.
I had Covid in Feb. 2020. I STILL have natural immunity.
I'm part of a nationwide study for immuno compromised individuals who've had Covid and take certain medications. In my case, Humira, to treat my Ankylosing Spondylitis - an inflammation disease of the spine. It can also impact shoulders, hips and major organs. In my case, I get an inflammed heart if I don't take my Humira regularly.
I'm tested every 6-8 weeks to measure my antibodies.
As of four weeks ago, I still carry the antibodies. I get tested again in early March.
I'm NOT surprised at this study at all. We've known since High School Science Classes that natural immunity is always better. It's long lasting and durable.
Those who had Sars Covid-2 have natural immunity to Covid-19 -- almost 20 years later.
Again, none of this should be a surprise to most freepers.
As with everything, ALWAYS follow the money. Pfizer, Merck, Janssen all got at least $1B from President Trump for developing the "vaccines." They're continuing their payday with "booster" shots now.
Hospitals were guaranteed $13k for every Covid-19 patient that walked in the door, thus incentivizing hospitals to report as many Covid-19 cases as possible.
They then got an additional $37k for each patient that went on a ventilator. Again, they were financially incentivized incentivized to put as many people on ventilators as possible.
It's ALWAYS about the money. Doesn't matter what we're talking about.
Is there a difference between how and if the persons were treated concerning the duration of protection?
One of the gold standards of medical research publishes 'gold standard' data on its Coronavirus Resource Center.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
From that site as of 1 February 2022,
( 5,674,493 "JHU official" global deaths / 7,924,043,134 global population ) x 100 = a two-year mortality rate of 0.072 %
As they are both "reliable and authoritative," from the same Johns Hopkins University site, the report on Communist China:
As of 4 February 2022, JHU reports "4,849" Covid deaths over two years for a nation of 1.4 billion people.
Do you consider this data "reliable and authoritative? A "gold standard" in reporting?
Honestly, I’d laugh even harder if it killed him.
Amazing that it has been so persistent, it's 2 years AND counting. Unlike the jabs that seem to wear off after 3-6 months and are not as effective to begin with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.