Posted on 02/03/2022 9:05:02 AM PST by artichokegrower
Los Angeles City Councilmen Paul Koretz, Paul Krekorian, and Mitch O’Farrell introduced a motion on Wednesday that could lead to Los Angeles implementing an ordinance to require all gun owners in the city to have firearm liability insurance, as well as pay an annual fee.
(Excerpt) Read more at californiaglobe.com ...
The gangs will be lined up for the policies. /sarc
could lead to Los Angeles implementing an ordinance to require all journalists in the city to have slander liability insurance, as well as pay an annual fee.
I wonder if they will release violators without bail?
What is bail for the gang banger without liability insurance for his gat?
What wonderful suggestions will they think of next?
This will ensure that the rights of the wealthy to bear arms shall not be abridged.
Similar to the celebrities and politicians with armed security guards and a limo driver taking them through the gates to their mansion at night. No worries about the no bail systems and easy parole or the decarceration of felons from prisons. Feels nice and safe.
Using a gun in a crime is the first thing plead out and very seldom prosecuted.
Registration of gang banger guns with liability insurance and fees optional.
Soon, everyone will be required to have liability insurance for their mouths...
Many would argue that requiring insurance and ‘an annual’ fee to exercise a Constitutional right might be considered, oh, I don’t know, unconstitutional. But I wouldn’t bet on it. Most of us don’t enjoy the subtile and nuanced minds of leftist judges who can discover a ‘right’ like abortion hiding in the penumbra of the right to privacy implied but not stated in the 4th Amendment yet are confused by the words ‘shall not be infringed’.
Well, lets see...California...
Must be 21 years of age to buy-Check.
Handgun and rifle registration-Check.
Background checks-Check.
Ban on A-s-s-ault rifles.-Check.
Ten day Waiting Periods-Check.
Red Flag law-Check
FBI checks-check.
Only California approved hand guns allowed-Check.
Tax on ammo-Check.
Background check for ammo purchases-Check.
Age limit of 21 for all guns. Check.
Micro-stamping -Check.
Age limit for ammo-Check.
Gun free zone-Check.
Ban on large magazines-Check.
No private individual sales-Check.
No buying out of state and bringing them into California.
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/what-legal-way-bring-a-firearm-california.htm
So what new scheme and dream will they come up with..
Ah mandatory Insurance for gun owners!
If they can make the 2nd amendment subject to insurance and fees, they can do the same with the 1st. And will likely try to do so.
Should be...Ban on standard capactiy magazines, if over 10 rounds-Check.
Be a shame if one of those “LA foller gangs” we’ve been reading about took an interest in these Fascist pieces of Mitt...
All under a pretense-of-law.
The people advocating these measures will not be influenced by petitions or protests and they do not believe they can be removed by "elections". Constitutional restraints to them are an annoyance written on a meaningless scrap of paper.
Interesting times.
And then the rest of the constitution.
Blatantly unconstitutional. “... shall not be infringed”.
Will the criminals that represent the illegal and murderous use of firearms care about the new rules to be applied to legal gun owners? No. So the effect it will have on violent gun related crime will be zip, zilch, nada.
Well said. 👍
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.