Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US unveils new policy for elite transgender swimmers
BBC News ^ | February 2, 2022

Posted on 02/02/2022 4:44:10 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

US competitive swimming's governing body has updated its policy on the eligibility of transgender athletes.

A three-person medical panel will now determine whether "prior physical development of the athlete as a male" gives transgender swimmers an unfair advantage, USA Swimming says.

There will also be testosterone tests for 36 months before competitions.

It comes as a transgender Pennsylvania university athlete has been smashing female swimming records.

The new policy was released on Tuesday and is effective immediately.

In a statement, USA Swimming said it "has and will continue to champion gender equity and the inclusivity of all cisgender and transgender women and their rights to participate in sport, while also fervently supporting competitive equity at elite levels of competition".

The policy for elite athletes, it said, "acknowledges a competitive difference in the male and female categories and the disadvantages this presents in elite head-to-head competition".

USA Swimming cited data showing that the top-ranked female athlete in 2021 would on average be ranked below 536th on male events that year.

The new policy "relies on science and medical evidence-based methods to provide a level-playing field for elite cisgender women", USA Swimming said.

They added that the policy serves "to mitigate the advantages associated with male puberty and physiology".

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; perverts; transgenderathletes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2022 4:44:10 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A breath of common sense or a CYA committee? My bet is on the latter.


2 posted on 02/02/2022 4:46:12 AM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This will please nobody.

Get the popcorn.

CC


3 posted on 02/02/2022 4:46:17 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Elite”?

Give me a break. They are all second string guys who couldn’t beat the top men athletes, so they decided to go beat the girls.


4 posted on 02/02/2022 4:47:59 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (81 million votes...and NOT ONE "Build Back Better" hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Muscle density...

The elephant is still in the room.

Ladies, you need to just walk off. These deluded dunderheads pretend it must be YOUR attitude and prefer to keep you down.

WALK THE WALK AND TALK THE TALK.


5 posted on 02/02/2022 4:48:55 AM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"A three-person medical panel will now determine whether "prior physical development of the athlete as a male" gives transgender swimmers an unfair advantage"

Duh!?!

6 posted on 02/02/2022 4:49:43 AM PST by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
CYA. A "committee" is going to evaluate each biological male who wants to swim as a female? Based on what?


7 posted on 02/02/2022 4:55:53 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
If you need a committee to deal with something as simple as male and female sports competition, you’ve already admitted that you’re feckless, incompetent, or both.

Eventually these governing bodies are going to paint themselves into a corner where they are forced to admit that only ONE category of sports competition — i.e., “competitors” (without any regard for gender distinction)— can be justified in the insane asylum they’ve created for themselves. Once that happens, they’ll just shut down rather than admit that women aren’t actually “equal” to men after all.

8 posted on 02/02/2022 4:56:54 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

Tubercle size will still be bigger in males, enabling a longer rotational lever arm from the joint axis, this greatest rotational force upon the joint. This will still exist even if no testosterone for 20 years.


9 posted on 02/02/2022 5:03:13 AM PST by inchworm (al )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin; ProtectOurFreedom

10 posted on 02/02/2022 5:04:48 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

A “committee” is going to evaluate each biological male who wants to swim as a female? Based on what?

You got balls? You’re a boy.


11 posted on 02/02/2022 5:05:03 AM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

An actual ground combat war with a peer-level enemy will also be quite revealing.


12 posted on 02/02/2022 5:05:51 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

See ten. “She’s” a man.


13 posted on 02/02/2022 5:06:18 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ya know I would feel differently about this but the very people who say “if he feels like a woman than he is a woman” are the students who now feel that they have no chance to win against her/him/he/she/IT. I hear students all the time say-oh he thinks he is a woman. Well then swim against this man who THINKS he is a woman and stop complaining. We told you so. Now do not come crying to us when you realize this was a BAD idea. And your parents will probably still send in donations to the college as alumns. If SHE is really committed then cut off your male parts but SHE wont do this because she is not that committed. Easy to say, “I want to play a girl for now to win all the prizes”.


14 posted on 02/02/2022 5:10:12 AM PST by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

CYA for sure....but it’s pathetic. It’s an attempt to please everyone but will please nobody. The LGBT crowd will cry ‘discrimination’ yet allowing for a subjective decision around whether a male can compete with girls - which will always be unfair for them.

This should be HEAVILY rejected, force them to choose the CORRECT position...males play with other males otherwise it is just cheating.


15 posted on 02/02/2022 5:11:07 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
When you deny reality you will, sooner or later, suffer for doing so. That's what reality is. That's how reality works.
16 posted on 02/02/2022 5:12:29 AM PST by glennaro (Do not live your life in irrational fear. Live unmasked, unvaxxed, untested; unbullied and unafraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m truly offended at being called a cisgender every time the media discusses gender.

Maybe I should celebrate it, but I’m sick of having to do and say things on the trans agends’s terms!


17 posted on 02/02/2022 5:14:30 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Maybe this Laz fellow, well known by many on this board, could be the decision maker based on his “”hit it” factors.


18 posted on 02/02/2022 5:23:43 AM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Singermom

I get a sense that I’m in a distinct minority here on this subject, but I’ve been laughing my ass off over this story since it starting getting media coverage.


19 posted on 02/02/2022 5:29:40 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Totally stupid. It’s in the chromosomes...period.


20 posted on 02/02/2022 5:37:12 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson