Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America
donaldjtrump.com ^ | 02/01/22 | Donald J. Trump

Posted on 02/01/2022 6:39:00 PM PST by conservative98

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

02/01/22

So pathetic to watch the Unselect Committee of political hacks, liars, and traitors work so feverishly to alter the Electoral College Act so that a Vice President cannot ensure the honest results of the election, when just one year ago they said that “the Vice President has absolutely no right to ensure the true outcome or results of an election.”

In other words, they lied, and the Vice President did have this right or, more pointedly, could have sent the votes back to various legislators for reassessment after so much fraud and irregularities were found.

If it were sent back to the legislators, or if Nancy Pelosi, who is in charge of Capitol security, had taken my recommendation and substantially increased security, there would have been no “January 6” as we know it!

Therefore, the Unselect Committee should be investigating why Nancy Pelosi did such a poor job of overseeing security and why Mike Pence did not send back the votes for recertification or approval, in that it has now been shown that he clearly had the right to do so!

(Excerpt) Read more at donaldjtrump.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitution; election; electionfraud2020; electoralcollege; electoralcollegeact; january6; mikepence; nevertrumpers; pdjt; pelosi; pence; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: central_va; Republican Wildcat
So the Veep’s responsibility is ceremonial?

I'm trying to remember when Congress was certifying the vote in 2009, for the Constitutionally-ineligible BO, and there was discussion here about whether and how VP Cheney could raise objections and halt the certification. I think he called for any (written) objections, and none were offered, and he went ahead and declared the vote count certified and valid, and the rest is history.

101 posted on 02/02/2022 12:53:05 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Another just “move on” to banana republic status moron speaks up.


102 posted on 02/02/2022 12:54:30 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

His lawyers? I am no constitutional expert. Perhaps they know something.


103 posted on 02/02/2022 12:54:38 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Buck Foe Jiden!I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Pence should have resigned on the morning of Jan 6th before he certified the fraud. This would have caused a MUCH NEEDED CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS.
104 posted on 02/02/2022 12:59:17 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

The election was fraudulent how in the hell can you sit there and accept this happening in this country!! If we don’t bring the fraud to the forefront and just move on they will CONTINUE to do this, ANYONE that believes this election was NOT STOLEN is a fool!!


105 posted on 02/02/2022 1:01:14 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vivenne
States such as Pennsylvania and others sent letters to Pence asking to have time, (I think it was 10 days) to review their certified results because from the time they were certified and Jan. 6, they had found problems and wanted to review them. They were not sure they should have been certified.

The states that went about it did it in the wrong way.

The state legislatures had the prior power to question ballots going back to 3 U.S. Code § 2 - Failure to make choice on prescribed day and 3 U.S. Code § 5 - Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors weeks before the ballots made it to Congress.

In fact, 3 U.S. Code § 2 - Failure to make choice on prescribed day may make delayed acceptance of mail-in ballots unconstitutional.

Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.
Since Election Day is the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, if a state has not selected its Electors on THAT day, this section of the US CODE says that the legislature may choose the electors after that, and not wait for a week for more ballots to arrive and be counted based on election official changes of election law by edict.

This section of US Code could have also been used to invalidate the 2:00am ballot dumps that put Biden over the top because those ballots arrived on the next day AFTER the day prescribed by law. The legislature could have cited US Code Title 3 § 2 to discard those ballots and call the election at that point. Of course, that action would have been immediately appealed to a friendly judge, who would then have to rule on the interpretation of the US Code, which would then get appealed all the way to SCOTUS.

Some legislatures did try to act, but they weakly went to the courts who refused to hear the cases. In my opinion, the state legislatures should have just cited US Law and unilaterally acted, making the Democrats have to go to court and object. Republicans didn't do that; they went to court first and objected after (mostly) Democrats unilaterally acted to change the election laws via executive fiat.

The lesson for 2024 is clear: don't rely on the courts. Republican legislatures should interpret their powers directly and unilaterally act. Don't ask Congress for anything; they have no role to play until 3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress. All sections prior to § 15 are about what the states are to do.

If Democrats don't like it, they can go to the courts and fight to interpret the US Code, making the debate public and national.

When Republicans go to the court first to block Democrats, the courts reject the cases and the media covers up the issues. When Democrats go to court, the courts hear their cases and act swiftly. Republicans need to unilaterally act wherever they have plenary power and then put the Democrats on the defensive when they run to the courts to block.

-PJ

106 posted on 02/02/2022 1:33:19 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I am only able to do one thing.

I will not be casting a vote to reelect Senator John Thune. I suggest all other registered voters of any party in the State of South Dakota, do the same and remove one impediment to future fair elections.


107 posted on 02/02/2022 2:41:44 AM PST by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Is that a quote from DoodleDawg or did she steal it?

They've been my words all along, and also those who understand the Constitution. Flattering as it might be to think that Trump monitors my posts and quotes them, I'm sure he came up with it all on his own.

108 posted on 02/02/2022 3:53:28 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

THAT is proof that Benedict Pence DID have the power. He knew it; they know it. They want to rescind that power.


109 posted on 02/02/2022 3:58:09 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (When government fears the people, there is liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If he didn’t have that power last year, why the rush to amend something?

Do any of the proposed changes have anything to do with what the Vice-President does?

110 posted on 02/02/2022 4:04:29 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vivenne
States such as Pennsylvania and others sent letters to Pence asking to have time, (I think it was 10 days) to review their certified results because from the time they were certified and Jan. 6, they had found problems and wanted to review them.

States did not. Or, more properly, state legislatures did not. Not a single legislature sent a competing slate of electors. Not a single legislature requested a delay. Any requests like that came from a small minority of members who did not have the authority to speak for the legislature as a whole.

Pence/the VP does have the authority to do this.

No he doesn't. Had a state formally asked him to delay then it might have given them pause, but in the end even that may not have been enough for Pence to do anything.

111 posted on 02/02/2022 4:09:54 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: central_va

no ahole...I don’t think it was legitimate....but that doesn’t change that fact that him whining about it endlessly will change anything. he’s making a fool of himself. if he intends to run again he should be working behind the scenes to prevent it from happening again. if he does run, and he obsesses on the last election instead of the criminal train-wreck that is the biden regime, he will lose.


112 posted on 02/02/2022 5:19:06 AM PST by wny ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wny

He is working behind the scenes as are many others in his camp. Why would you think he wasnt?


113 posted on 02/02/2022 5:53:02 AM PST by vivenne (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

It’s hold be mentioned but the ain’t focus should be on 22 and 24. Trump should have been prepared for the fraud. I’m VS, they were prepared.


114 posted on 02/02/2022 6:39:27 AM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

And better Lawyers.


115 posted on 02/02/2022 6:48:30 AM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: vivenne
He should have done it in 2020, but that's watter under the bridge. If he wins in 2024, no more mister nice guy and absolutely no Globalists!!
116 posted on 02/02/2022 6:51:26 AM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

VA.


117 posted on 02/02/2022 6:51:54 AM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

“They sent letters requesting time to review.”

Individual legislators sent letters.

No legislature did.


118 posted on 02/02/2022 7:26:24 AM PST by Mariner (War criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

“Isn’t that why Cruz and Hawley wanted to allow the 10 days to review the legislators concerns? But, Pence torpedoed it.”

Cruz and Hawley were two individual senators voicing individual opinions.

The US Senate voted to accept all electors sent by the states.

Pence torpedoed nothing. He did not have ANY power to do anything except accede to the will of the joint session as expressed by the majority vote.


119 posted on 02/02/2022 7:30:20 AM PST by Mariner (War criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Another just “move on” to banana republic status moron speaks up.”

To whom are you referring?

The morons who believe the VP could reject electors sent by the states AND accepted by a joint session of congress?

Because that’s a whole ‘nuther level of Qtardedness.


120 posted on 02/02/2022 7:33:07 AM PST by Mariner (War criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson