Posted on 01/21/2022 9:51:11 AM PST by nickcarraway
SNIP
Akram's manner of death has been ruled homicide. Medical examiner records list Akram's time of death as 9:22 p.m. on January 15.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
“Clergy and staff at the synagogue had taken courses for a number of years through the FBI, the Anti-Defamation League, the Colleyville Police Department, and Secure Community Network in order to prepare for the possibility of an intruder.” -Wikipedia
#I’m surprised it wasn’t ruled a covid death
LOL, I was going to comment “and covid”.
An Islamic Happy Ending
In all honesty, at this point in our history, I’d like to make sure that extra-judiciary killings by the FBI remain a crime, thank you. I’M NOT SAYING THAT THE POLICE ARE GUILTY OF ANY CRIME. And, YES, THE TERRORIST PROBABLY DESERVED THE DEATH PENALTY. But I still am bothered by reports WHICH MAY NOT BE TRUE that he shot after the hostage threat was gone.
I don't think so. The coroner was simply following procedure. The manner of death was, in fact, homicide. It was not natural, accident, suicide, or, undetermined, the only other available categories. Although, if the category "suicide by cop" was available, I would not object. It does sound as if he was determined to die in a "blaze of glory". He obviously intended to take as many Americans and Jews - or best of all American Jews - with him as he could.
“Authorities remain baffled...”
I would consider that an unfortunate possibility in today's degenerate times. Not really likely, but conceivable.
Muslim terrorists are a protected class, according to the Leftists. We have a few of their supporters in Congress right now.
Rule #2: Double Tap
Will he lie in state while rep. Omar weeps?
I don’t weep for this Muslim terrorist, at all.
But it is curious to me why the FBI killed a guy after all the hostages managed to escape (all on their own, mind you, no thanks to FBI).
Sounds like they wanted to make sure he didn’t talk.
It was a “homicide”.
That doesn’t mean any laws were broken.
An intentional killing is a homicide. Some homicides are legal.
I committed homicide dropping bombs off a F16. They were legal homicides.
The democrats love letting these terrorists into the country.
Yes, I understand but who knows what the definition of legal is these days. I trust intelligence agency bean counters to be reliably subversive at every opportunity. They have a long track record of which to refer to.
“Will Biden order White House flags to be flown at half-staff?”
Maybe the Democrats will hold a candle light vigil in his honor?
No. An autopsy is a medical procedure and uses the medical definition of homicide. Medically any death that is the result, directly or indirectly, accidentally or intentionally, by the actions of another person is defined as a homicide.
“Another gun violence homicide of a minority added to the stats.”
Real problem here is that he may have a muslim name, but he is a British national. So unless it is stressed by someone, sincerely doubt, it won’t be called that. And since he wasn’t an American citizen, it won’t go on our stats either. It is being word treated as a domestic criminal act by the media and not a terror related act.
wy69
Hopefully, while in severe pain
And the problem is?
This was not a homicide. That implies the shooters had ulterior motives.
He was killed. Can’t just say that?
Thank you. Duplicity is in rat DNA and experience has taught me they are capable of anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.