Posted on 01/09/2022 7:13:50 AM PST by Mean Daddy
Nebraska's prison inmate population is growing faster than anywhere else in the nation, way out of sync with nearly every other state.
And the smoking gun behind much of that growth — and the millions of dollars that those extra inmates are costing Nebraska taxpayers — is a 2009 state law that created new gun crimes and toughened penalties. The law also helped steer hundreds of offenders from federal prisons into the state system, adding to the tab for Nebraska taxpayers.
As Gov. Pete Ricketts and the Legislature debate whether a new $230 million prison is needed to deal with the state's chronically overcrowded and understaffed corrections system, The World-Herald has uncovered a significant untold story behind the prison crisis.
No state grew its prison population more in the last decade than Nebraska. Its inmate count increased 16% between 2010 and 2020 even as such numbers nationally fell by nearly a fourth, according to a World-Herald analysis of U.S. Justice Department data. In fact, Nebraska and Idaho are the only states whose prisoner numbers didn't decline over the decade.
So at a time when many states across the country are closing prisons, Nebraska is staring at the possibility of building a pricey new one to deal with what has recently become the nation's most overcrowded prison system.
(Excerpt) Read more at omaha.com ...
Great news! Somebody is sane around here!
“ Overall, however, trends for homicides and shootings in Omaha have been down in recent years.”
It’s the old “We put more people in prisons even though the crime rate is down” Dim argument.
I would say chaos. Practically the same thing. Heaven,OTOH, would be a place of rule and order and tranquility.
To be sure, it’s not just offenders sentenced under the 2009 gun law who are filling up Nebraska’s prisons. Numerous other factors contribute to Nebraska’s nation-leading incarceration growth.
Research has consistently shown the certainty of being arrested is a vastly more powerful deterrent than punishment.
It is the arresting, not the punishment. sure, it is.
The kinds of gang-related shootings that sparked the gun crackdown in 2009 continue — including the death last month of a 14-year-old Omaha girl. Overall, however, trends for homicides and shootings in Omaha have been down in recent years.
Every article has an agenda, learn to read closely.
WTH kind of reasoning is this.
In article it says research shows the threat of being arrested is a greater deterrent than threat of punishment?
Who writes this crap?
They are probably unhappy because most of the offenders are minority groups from the cities they likely will scream aboutmthe new law,being “racist”
Expect this headline, if it’s not already out there:
“Crime down in Nebraska despite substantial increase in prison population”
Traffic drugs on I80, jail ! We have teams that concentrate on that and that alone.
Average of $145 dollars per day to house each inmate (most of whom are illegals in many states- some prisons are made up,of almost 70% illegals)
That works,out to about $50,000 per inmate per year, but thstnis IF they don’t launch multiple lawsuits trying to,overturn their convictions- some inmates cost a heck,of,a,lot more,than $145 p/d
“It’s not acceptable anymore, for political reasons, or any reason, to simply address a problem by putting people in prison for long periods of time,” Ashford said.
This is the concluding statement of the article.
A good time to move to Nebraska.
Note a few things here:
1. They don’t give a reason why the laws were toughened. In light of that, I’ll give the reason - the feds were NOT putting people away, and neither were judges in LaHood.
2. They hit the government from the Right, by implying this is a waste of money...basically saying that keeping violent felons separated from society is a money wasted. Hitting from the right in terms of money spent is a common tactic for the Left when they know any other approach will backfire.
3. They don’t give any context on the amount of money being spent. Nebraska is a big state, the cost of the new jail is a pittance.
4. They don’t mind showing us how the jails are being emptied throughout the country, but they don’t seem very interested in showing what is concurrently happening with crime rates.
But, as I always say, THEY OWN THE MEDIA, so THEY can do as they please.
“ They could always go one step further and deport any inmate who cannot provide proof of citizenship. ”
Then you have some idiots committing crimes just to get a free ride home. The way this usually works is they are deported after serving their sentences. Personally, I know what I would do with interlopers who commit crimes in America, but maybe that’s just me.
“Be interesting to see the demographic change for those ten years.”
Meant to include that - their population grew about 10% over those 10 years, so their incarceration rate only increased a bit over their population. And no doubt most of that growth was in the minority population, so it’s probably a push (at most) overall.
“Research has consistently shown the certainty of being arrested is a vastly more powerful deterrent than punishment.”
When I see something like that, I start to wonder who is writing this ‘article’. Is it really a reporter who just stumbled on to this ‘research’ for the article, or is it a BLM Lawyer, or Soros Lawyer, for example?
They don’t give a reason why the laws were toughened.
I have always believed in early release to un-crowd the prisons:
The sooner the trap door is released, the sooner the prison isn't crowded: for every new admission, the most serious offender is released to God, to make room.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.