SUE and then SUE again!
Take a step back and look at the situation. There is something really, really wrong here.
Sure sounds like coercion to me.
How much data do CEO’s need to be shown to convince them these vaccines are not working as intended? Why bother with staffing issues for a medicine that is at best partially effective and for which the company would be held financially responsible for adverse events?
From the pits of hell.
I wouldn't sign either.
Memo: Moving your Outlook messages to Archive deletes them from online storage and online backups. Deleting the messages from the Archive makes the encrypted files unrecoverable.
Eating their own. Meh. So goeth the lesson.
Companies should be able to fire and hire. Most companies are reasonable, if they aren’t then they should fail. .Gov shouldn’t have a finger on the scale of success in either way.
Is that the same as Citi Bank — Costco credit card?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4027626/posts
Of course don’t sign…
The vaccines negatively impact death and disease.
Therefore citi’s rules are worse than arbitrary and capricious, they are harmful.
I saw an unconfirmed blurb that the Navy, while rejecting religious exemptions, is approving them if you say you are Muslim.
Just get a fake vax card. If you get Covid it won’t matter because the vax doesn’t work.
That headline and story cannot possibly be true. A major capitalistic, American money-center bank and its CEO would never, ever let its far-left, socialist/communist political views obtrusively interfere with its rational, practical business decisions, amirite?
What if they agree to get an approved vaccine ONCE it becomes available? No one should be forced to accept an experimental vaccine today. And that “Okay, let me know when and where I can get the real approved vaccine.” should be sufficient for the moment.
“Employees will be required to sign an agreement stating that they will not pursue legal action against Citigroup to receive year-end bonus payments.”
One should not have to enter an agreement to receive what one is already apparently entitled to.
Since the year end ends next DEC, I would say that anyone who signs this paper is retarded.
“by Jan. 14”
Forcing employees to get the J&J one-shot vaccine carries the typically higher risk of that vaccine.
“But.. But... They are so handy! I only have to click two buttons instead of three like the competitors!”
Personal self interest and outright laziness will rule out a boycott that is actually effective.
No one will do what should be done and go make the effort to move all their banking elsewhere. Even though there could even be an advantage of refinancing somewhere else.
Just too lazy to even try to stand on principle and actually make a difference in mass.
“Don’t bother me right now... I might think about it after the ball game is over”.