Skip to comments.
Pfizer Vaccine EXPOSED! Less than 1% effective, Did More Harm Than Good, They Knew It and Tricked You
The New American ^
| December 31, 2021
| Ben Armstrong
Posted on 12/31/2021 9:39:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Pfizer used a math trick to make people believe their vaccine was 95% effective, but the truth is it was 0.8% effective.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: alternatereality; antivaxxcult; antivaxxerlies; conspiracynonsense; embarrassinggarbage; fakenewssource; flunkedbiology; flunkedmath; fudge; ifitsontheinternet; imaginaryworld; itmustbetrue; notanewsarticle; notanewssource; pfizermath; wentfullqtard; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From it's intial release, it was claiming .8% efficacy (absolute reduction of risk) but they chose to report 95% (relative reduction of risk) and the FDA, CDC, Walenksy, Fauci and NIH all helped to confuse the public on that issue.
Nurses in interviews said 'vaccines' aren't 100% perfect, you still have a 5% chance of getting Covid. They were intentionally and knowingly using the distorted Relative Reduction of Risk as if it was Absolute Reduction of Risk. Then time went on and it increasingly looks like the 'vaccines' have a negative risk reduction (they seem to cause people to be more likely to get infected).
2
posted on
12/31/2021 9:45:23 PM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
3
posted on
12/31/2021 9:50:02 PM PST
by
Big Red Badger
(Make His Paths Straight!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s 100% effective in making money for Pfizer. That’s all Pfizer wanted.
To: ransomnote
I’ve seen this math before and it’s misleading.
5
posted on
12/31/2021 9:54:42 PM PST
by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: Lurch Addams
Those executive stock options just don’t happen! Sell, sell, sell!
6
posted on
12/31/2021 9:56:13 PM PST
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Lurch Addams
"That's all Pfizer wanted."
And all that Dr Faucet and the vested Congress critters wanted.
7
posted on
12/31/2021 9:59:36 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: ransomnote
From it’s intial release, it was claiming .8% efficacy (absolute reduction of risk) but they chose to report 95% (relative reduction of risk).....
Yes.
We’ve known this for almost a year. I guess it takes the Canadians awhile to figure it out.
8
posted on
12/31/2021 10:04:45 PM PST
by
Ceebass
(USA RIP 1776-2021)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Are u kidding! According to the media, no one cares about Facts 🤔
To: ransomnote
The worst trick Pfizer played on everyone was to get released from all liability when it was found that their vaccine does not work as advertised.
10
posted on
12/31/2021 10:16:35 PM PST
by
miserare
( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11
posted on
12/31/2021 10:30:18 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They are still getting paid by the tax payer via government power. They are still immune from being legally liable for any damage it does. Cha Ching, Cha Ching, Cha Ching!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
About the same as throwing a penny in a fountain with your fingers crossed.
13
posted on
12/31/2021 11:20:23 PM PST
by
MDLION
(J"Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
To: Lurch Addams; All
Yup, it’s all about MONEY. big pharma and lobbyists paid off govt employees, the CDC, NIH, and FDA. Politicians love seeing Americans conditioned and in fear. That part is achieving CONTROL of the populace.
14
posted on
12/31/2021 11:42:04 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They didn’t trick us.
They outright lied to us.
15
posted on
12/31/2021 11:49:22 PM PST
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thanks for posting. I assumed they meant efficacy, but when the experiential evidence blew that away with delta and now omicron.
Thanks again, I am under the cams mandate, with an exemption.
16
posted on
01/01/2022 2:09:20 AM PST
by
momincombatboots
(Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with. )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
17
posted on
01/01/2022 2:23:01 AM PST
by
SaveFerris
(The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
To: ransomnote
Let's see how the usual suspects respond to this thread, since it doesn't have the bogeyman Malone in it to hijack away from discussing the merits of the Canadian report.
-PJ
18
posted on
01/01/2022 2:36:43 AM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Cobra64
19
posted on
01/01/2022 2:58:45 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Delta Omicron is an anagram of Media Control.)
To: Political Junkie Too
“Let’s see how the usual suspects respond to this thread, since it doesn’t have the bogeyman Malone in it to hijack away from discussing the merits of the Canadian report.”
They won’t, they run off when it gets real. This ain’t the Chemtrail controversy, this is real in your face mass genocide.
20
posted on
01/01/2022 3:58:51 AM PST
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson