Posted on 12/31/2021 6:04:07 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
He is the preeminent authority on mRNA technology and holds patents including but not limited to in-vivo RNA transfection, mRNA as a drug, mRNA production, transient gene therapy and also methods for mRNA stabilization.
He has reviewed the Pfizer, Moderna and J&J support/release data and offers an extremely informed opinion on their efficacy and potential dangers.
He does NOT however offer any conclusion on dosing parameters other than that it’s usage should NOT be mandated most especially NOT mandated on children and he has plenty of supporting data to justify that professional judgement.
You stating having “heard him do it lot’s of times on Bannon’s show” is hardly compelling or persuasive.
And I don't think you're qualified to say what Malone should or should not assert.
Exactly, that poster is using what is known as the straw man argument, a definite sign of weakness in their position... But when that is all they have, there is a tendency to grasp at straws.
Saved
I don’t think anyone disputes that, but having the skills to develop a technology doesn’t qualify you to say how it should be used —————————————————————In his case, it does.
Same pattern as global warming. Bending “science” to the whim of the dollar.
If citizens can’t do math to put things in perspective it’s easy to scare them.
Good thing I didn't do that then.
He can assert anything he wants and I can have my opinion on his qualifications to do so.
Simple.
You know what’s funny about the left is they think someone has to be an expert on something to have a valid opinion on it. It’s funny how they then cleave it to the most precise degree to try and compel others to dismiss when someone presents an inconvenient truth.
They don’t believe this themselves of course, they think it will sway us. Very childish and silly.
They’ll say”
Oh, he’s not a doctor.
Ok, but he’s not an epidemiologist.
Ok then, but he’s done most of his work in the tropics.
Yeah, but the tropics of Asia, this came from Africa.
Oh....ok. Whatever.
Seriously? The issue is his opining on strategies for the use of the vaccines.
He does talk about this a lot and even publishes op-eds:
Vaccine inventor questions mandatory shot push, Biden’s Covid-19 strategy
You didn't know that?
The article is 95% public policy with a drop of epidemiology.
In both areas I'm interested to hear his opinion I don't consider him an expert or even necessarily well informed.
Did you even read my comment. You either have reading comprehension issues or you’re just plain obtuse.
I am taking Mark Twain’s advice now concerning arguing with a fool.
Have a pleasant New Years Day.
You said:
"He does NOT however offer any conclusion on dosing parameters other than that it’s usage should NOT be mandated most especially NOT mandated on children and he has plenty of supporting data to justify that professional judgement."
I posted an entire article written by him, a key part of which was explicit dosing parameters. Namely, people not at high risk shouldn't get a dose at all.
Sorry if you couldn't follow the thread.
I am taking Mark Twain’s advice now concerning arguing with a fool.
Have a pleasant New Years Day.
Peace.
Right, just for you to know . . .you don’t stack up very well compared to Malone. . .in fact all you demonstrate is your sophistry . . Hey its a free country . . .knock yourself out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.