Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Robert Malone on Joe Rogan’s Show: Everyone Involved in mRNA VAXX-Tech Has Financial Conflicts of Interest
The Liberty Daily ^ | Dec. 31, 2021 | J.D. Rucker

Posted on 12/31/2021 6:04:07 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

The people who are getting paid to determine the validity of Covid-19 vaccines are financially incentivized to research, analyze, and approve them. That’s the basic takeaway from the first of many revelations Dr. Robert Malone dropped during his interview with Joe Rogan.

We can expect a lot more. This two-minute clip is just the beginning. As Jack Posobiec from Human Events declared while retweeting the clip, “Here we go!!”

Rogan pointed out that Dr. Malone is being censored by Big Tech despite being “one of the most qualified people in the world to talk about vaccines.”

Dr. Malone explained that he’s been contacted by multiple lawyers who want to file suit against platforms like Twitter who have censored his perspectives. He then revealed that other people like him who have a voice in the debate, many of whom participate in approving the experimental drugs themselves, are all getting paid.

“If it’s not okay for me to be part of the conversation even though I’m point out scientific facts that may be inconvenient, then who is? Who can be allowed? Whether you’re in the camp that says I’m a liar and I didn’t invent this technology despite the patents — and there’s a whole cohort of that — no one can dispute that I played a major role in the creation of this tech, and virtually all other voices that have that background have conflicts of interest… financial conflicts of interest. I think I’m the only one who doesn’t. I’m not getting any money out of this.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; bigtech; bloggers; corruption; covid19; joerogan; malone; moderna; mrna; narrativeoverfacts; pfizer; profit; robertmalone; spotify; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2021 6:04:07 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There are rumors of Fauci involvement with Wuhan on viruses with very high, 50% range, fatality rates. I worry that some of these are in line to be released next.


2 posted on 12/31/2021 6:11:23 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dr. Malone is who I trust most.


3 posted on 12/31/2021 6:11:47 PM PST by lonestar (Texan for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
 
 
It's been evident for a while - corporations are in charge of this "emergency". Not the FDA, the Surgeon General, not president Demento. Corporations. Endless contracts, mass revenue streams.
 
 

4 posted on 12/31/2021 6:15:37 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
...no one can dispute that I played a major role in the creation of this tech...

I don't think anyone disputes that, but having the skills to develop a technology doesn't qualify you to say how it should be used.

5 posted on 12/31/2021 6:21:26 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Yeah it does. I listened to this 3 hour podcast on the road today. It was a tour de force of expertise. This man has this nailed and points out deep errors.


6 posted on 12/31/2021 6:25:59 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Yes, but you have missed the point (quite by mistake, I’m sure).

The actual point is that he is qualified to speak on the matter. He is being denied a platform, inexplicably.


7 posted on 12/31/2021 6:28:54 PM PST by Sarcazmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: semimojo
I don't think anyone disputes that, but having the skills to develop a technology doesn't qualify you to say how it should be used.

Only lifelong professional affirmative action feral government bureaucrats/educrats with massive financial conflicts-of-interest are qualified to do that.

https://thelibertydaily.com/dr-robert-malone-on-joe-rogans-show-everyone-involved-in-mrna-vaxx-tech-has-financial-conflicts-of-interest/

10 posted on 12/31/2021 6:34:22 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

“...but having the skills to develop a technology doesn’t qualify you to say how it should be used.”

And when precisely did Dr. Malone do that?


11 posted on 12/31/2021 6:34:29 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bookmark


12 posted on 12/31/2021 7:05:19 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Stinks of RICO?


13 posted on 12/31/2021 7:23:30 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thanks for all the great posts tonight.

Happy New Year!


14 posted on 12/31/2021 7:27:49 PM PST by Golden Eagle (What's in YOUR injection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Megadittoes!


15 posted on 12/31/2021 7:28:30 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
And when precisely did Dr. Malone do that?

I've heard him do it lot's of times on Bannon's show.

16 posted on 12/31/2021 7:32:37 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sarcazmo
He is being denied a platform, inexplicably.

I think he should be able to say what he wants, but his background as a biochemical researcher doesn't make me value his epidemiological musings.

17 posted on 12/31/2021 7:34:43 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

18 posted on 12/31/2021 7:36:33 PM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

I would be one of those folks, and INTEND TO STAY THAT WAY!


19 posted on 12/31/2021 8:51:47 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

.


20 posted on 12/31/2021 9:00:24 PM PST by sauropod (Resident Bidet. A confused old man at the wrong bus stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson