That’s separate from correctly interpreting stats.
Just looking at the stat as presented should automatically make a reasonable evaluator ask more questions: How many cases have there been? What is the vaccination rate? What is the split of vaccine types among the infected (because they’re not all the same, especially in Europe!)? And so on.
Otherwise, it’s like these idiots in the press shrieking about how 80% of the people arrested by police in City A are black or other minority, thus proving THAT THE POLICE ARE RAYCISSS AND WE NEED TO DEFUND THEM while not mentioning the tiny little fact that, hey, turns out that the supermajority of people in City A are, actually, black or other minority.
From the data presented, you don’t know if all the infected had one vaccine type or if it was mixed. Europe has approved (IIRC) five, of which only two are mRNA based.
Sounds like the pharmaceutical companies have deliberately made it impossible to collect valid data, what with obliterating control groups and mixing boosters..
I wonder why they want to make it impossible?