Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge upholds ruling against NYT over Project Veritas memos
Associated Press ^ | December 25, 2021

Posted on 12/24/2021 10:30:33 PM PST by Olog-hai

A New York judge has upheld an order preventing The New York Times from publishing documents between conservative group Project Veritas and its lawyer and ruled that the newspaper must immediately relinquish confidential legal memos it obtained.

The decision Thursday by State Supreme Court Justice Charles D. Wood in Westchester County, released Friday, comes in a defamation lawsuit Project Veritas filed against the Times in 2020.

Months after the lawsuit was filed, the newspaper reported that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Project Veritas in connection with the theft of a diary belonging to Ashley Biden, the president’s daughter. In that story, the Times quoted the memos, leading Project Veritas to accuse the newspaper of violating attorney-client privilege.

Wood upheld his earlier order preventing the Times from further publishing the memos, and also ruled that the newspaper must turn over physical copies of the documents and destroy electronic versions. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ashleybiden; associatedpress; bidenvoters; defamation; facebook; hunterbiden; joerogan; markzuckerberg; media; mediawingofthednc; msm; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; projectveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/24/2021 10:30:33 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Wow, did NYT and AP twist a logical pretzel there.


2 posted on 12/24/2021 10:37:16 PM PST by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Wood upheld his earlier order preventing the Times from further publishing the memos, and also ruled that the newspaper must turn over physical copies of the documents and destroy electronic versions. …

Which I am certain they will do, since they’re so big on “the Rule of Law” and all.

3 posted on 12/24/2021 10:40:57 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Judge Wood is in his early 50s.

My granddaughters know more about computers than he does.

4 posted on 12/24/2021 10:50:10 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
My granddaughters know more about computers than he does.
Curious as to your point.
5 posted on 12/24/2021 11:10:25 PM PST by citizen (Thieves of private property pass their lives in chains; thieves of public prop. in riches and luxury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Now Veritas can use this against The NY Times in court


6 posted on 12/24/2021 11:34:11 PM PST by Hambone 1934 (Dems love playing Nazis.....The republicans love helping them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Curious as to your point.

Wood upheld his earlier order preventing the Times from further publishing the memos, and also ruled that the newspaper must turn over physical copies of the documents and destroy electronic versions. …

Yes, "judge" - I TOTALLY destroyed my electronic versions.

And if you don't believe me, just ask me - I'll tell you.

Important people of "a certain age" have "people" for their computer needs. They don't actually understand about the "galvanized go-fasters" of computers and data storage.

7 posted on 12/24/2021 11:43:14 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You’re missing the bigger point of the order: the Times must turn over all hard copies of the atty-client documents. There is a possibility that those copies will have some identifying marks that can trace it to the original “leaker”. The Times may attempt to reproduce, (forge), copies of the documents to attempt to pass them off as the original, but I doubt that even they would risk destruction of the original documents.


8 posted on 12/25/2021 2:23:52 AM PST by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usnavy_cop_retired

It would be wonderful if it would confirm what we all know - the documents came straight from the corrupt anti-American FBI. The FBI raid on PV was likely done for the express purposes of assisting the NYT in its litigation against PV and as a politically motivated attack against a leading conservative organization. Christopher Wray is just upholding the FBI’s fine traditions of abuse of authority and intimidation of patriotic American citizens.


9 posted on 12/25/2021 4:25:27 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: usnavy_cop_retired

They will appeal it to the next court in New York which won’t be as friendly.


10 posted on 12/25/2021 5:24:28 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

...ruled that the newspaper must turn over physical copies of the documents and destroy electronic versions.

There was a crime committed here. The electronic copies should be *preserved* not *destroyed* to help identify the origin of the leak to the NYTimes, which is pretty much going to be the corrupt FBI.


11 posted on 12/25/2021 6:18:38 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

The NYT must attest on a sworn affidavit they deleted or destroyed everything.

If it is learned they did not do so, or the info is leaked to another entity, severe criminal penalties can be brought. Also, PV would have grounds to sue the NYT for civil rights violations and damages. I can only assume that the punitive damages amount would destroy the Old Gray Lady for good.


12 posted on 12/25/2021 6:30:28 AM PST by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

This ruling came from the NY State Supreme Court.


13 posted on 12/25/2021 6:31:32 AM PST by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas

True. But they have two more to go through before the supreme courts.


14 posted on 12/25/2021 7:15:33 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas

Let’s hope in their arrogance and distain for laws applying to them they do so.

And the outcome is as you describe!


15 posted on 12/25/2021 7:17:53 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas
This ruling came from the NY State Supreme Court.

Yes, and in NY, the Supreme Court is the trial court; Court of Appeals is the state’s highest court. News flash or perhaps already knew that. Yeah, you probably already knew that.

16 posted on 12/25/2021 8:07:31 AM PST by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ahithophel

I didn’t, actually. I figured like most states, the State Supreme Court was the highest state court.

I figured federal court was the next step.

A bit snarky this Christmas morning, aren’t we?


17 posted on 12/25/2021 8:52:40 AM PST by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sopo

It is good of this judge to STOP the New York Slimes, which was COLLABORATING with the FBI to obstruct justice and interfere with the dissemination of truth.


18 posted on 12/25/2021 10:46:55 AM PST by 2harddrive (FREE 3D-printable Firearm blueprints available here: https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

It has to go up to SCOTUS, like everything the leftards try to do which is plainly wrong.


19 posted on 12/25/2021 11:02:46 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Buck Foe Jiden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

It’ll be encrypted and stored on a floppy or in the Cloud. Nothing is ever lost or destroyed anymore.


20 posted on 12/25/2021 11:04:33 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Buck Foe Jiden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson