Posted on 12/20/2021 5:35:51 AM PST by eyeamok
Two hundred forty-one million people, 97,000 villages. Everybody tested positive was treated with Ivermectin, the household members were given Ivermectin to prevent spread, and all of the health care workers on Ivermectin. And by doing that, over the many months after that surge in May, they found that in September, they started to report they’d effectively eradicated disease.
(Excerpt) Read more at redvoicemedia.com ...
How did they do it without Ivermectin?
India’s Uttar Pradesh State Now COVID-Free, Recovery Rate Up 98.6% Because Of Ivermectin
https://www.christianitydaily.com/articles/13293/20210917/india-s-uttar-pradesh-state-now-covid-free-recovery-rate-up-98-6-because-of-ivermectin.htm
Uttar Pradesh government says early use of Ivermectin helped to keep positivity, deaths low
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/uttar-pradesh-government-says-ivermectin-helped-to-keep-deaths-low-7311786/
India's Ivermectin Blackout - Part V: The Secret Revealed
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/indias-ivermectin-blackout---part-v-the-secret-revealed/article_9a37d9a8-1fb2-11ec-a94b-47343582647b.html
And among your favored sources... "How did India beat covid-19?"
https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2021/10/29/how-did-india-beat-covid-19
Were one to accept your premise -- "about 70, effectively killing off the prime Covid targets before they can be hit" -- then after almost all 70+ die off around the world, the pandemic should be almost over.
All one need do is wait for those like over 70-Ezekiel Emanuel, Pelosi, Trump and Biden, Schumer and McConell, to die off.
I know the ivermectin true believers will poo poo any fact checking of the Uttar Pradesh claims, but for the rest of us:
If you do an internet search on Uttar Pradesh Covid you will find many pages of links debunking the ivermectin success claims the other links are touting. Who to believe? Like nikos1121 at #3 on this thread, I doubt claims made by both sides. But it is good to at least consider both sides. So:
“This is not even remotely the case,” he said during a lecture with other doctors on Oct. 15. While there are claims that the state began using ivermectin in May 2021, during the height of India’s COVID-19 crisis, the government actually said it began giving the drug in August 2020.
“Not only did it not hasten the end of that alpha wave, but it didn’t prevent the delta wave,” Mark said.
Mark cited research where scientists looked at data for all deaths in India, and found that certain populous districts in Uttar Pradesh had no reported deaths at all for several months.
“So either you have to believe that ivermectin prevents you from dying of everything — car crashes, cancer, homicide, suicide — or, that the data is just garbage and you can’t interpret it,” he said.
The Indian government stopped recommending ivermectin (and HCQ, too) in September, citing lack of evidence (links included in source above). That may have been a bad decision when one considers the following, however:
Ivermectin may help covid-19 patients—but only those with worms [—Really ?!?!] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4017143/posts
High prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections among primary school children, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2015
https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-017-0354-7
So, yes, ivermectin may well have been beneficial for Covid patients in Uttar Pradesh — because ... worms.
bttt
Guessing the author skipped Journalism 101 class when they were taught to put the subject of the title in the first sentence. Most authors these days never attended Journalism 101.
5 Mechanisms of ADE (How Does Antibody Dependent Enhancement Occur?
https://odysee.com/@DrMobeenSyed:1/5-mechanisms-of-ade-(how-does-antibody:0
Yeah, me too. Why couldn’t the word “India”, at least, have appeared somewhere within the headline or the first couple of sentences?
re: “Here are the real key pieces of information. In short, ivermectin didn’t do what is claimed.”
Like the roach that can’t be squashed, you’re back and as sure as anything you’re ‘peddling the truth’ ...
What do your masters pay you in - bitcoin or Chinese yuan? Or maybe big pharma pays you - in Swiss francs maybe?
CatHerd or catturd?
What the anti-therapeutic crowd DOES NOT want you to know -
“Dr Peter McCullough with Joe Rogan – The Joe Rogan Experience #1747”
https://rumble.com/vqx8ma-dr-peter-mccullough-with-joe-rogan-the-joe-rogan-experience-1747.html
bttt
That’s the trouble with Q followers and conspiracy theory types — you can only come up with calling others names and bullying in response, no reasoned debate. So sad.
> “if you do an internet search on Uttar Pradesh Covid you will find many pages of links debunking the ivermectin success claims .....”
I saw it on the internet so it must be true .....
“With the administration of over two crore vaccine doses in just 20 days, Uttar Pradesh has emerged as the fastest state in India to carry out Covid-19 vaccination. What adds to the achievement is that the daily rate of vaccination in UP is more than than that of the United States and Russia.”
” I don’t believe anything anybody says on either side.”
That’s fn stupid.
Join your kin at post 4
Who are you going to believe? Who, Tony Fauci and the lying left-wing press or the front-line doctors who have risked their careers to treat thousands of patients showing good results with ivermectin/hydroxychloroquine plus zinc and vitamins, 240 million Indians, numerous cities and counties in South America that have gone against their governments’ orders and supplied ivermectin to their citizens with reported good results?
What accounts for the low morbidity rate in Sub-Saharan Africa? Could it be the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment for malaria?
re: “That’s the trouble with Q followers”
Dumbazz, I don’t even KNOW who ‘Q” is.
Dumbazz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.