16,000 Physicians and Scientists Say Children Should NOT Get COVID Vaccine

21st century wire ^ | Robert Malone MD

[Triple]

Before you vaccinate your child — which is irreversible and potentially permanently damaging — find out why 16,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly declaring that healthy children should NOT be vaccinated for COVID-19.

On behalf of these M.D.s and Ph.D.s, I have published a clear statement outlining the scientific facts behind this decision: My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.

I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases. After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.

Before you inject your child — a decision that is irreversible — I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created: There are three issues parents need to understand: The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including: Their brain and nervous system. Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots. Their reproductive system.

This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system. The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable: You can’t fix the lesions within their brain. You can’t repair heart tissue scarring. You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system. This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family.

The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested. We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks.

Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later.

Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history. One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie. Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents. It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease.

In summary: There is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives. The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close. As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.

RW Malone, M.D.

Chief Medical and Regulatory Officer, the Unity Project President, International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists More on the twisted logic of vaccinating the children to protect the elderly “Never in human history have old people required young people to take risks, make sacrifices and die to preserve older people. We have a fiduciary duty to our children. Old people sacrifice themselves for children in a moral society, in a robust society, in a society that we are proud of. We do not tell children to take risks to preserve old people. We need to stand up and take a moral choice and an ethical choice for our children.” — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. testimony before Louisiana State Legislature I first became conscious of the twisted logic of vaccinating the children to protect the elderly when I saw the CNN “indirect marketing” campaign to vaccinate children with an unlicensed experimental Pfizer product.

After the shock of the realization that what was going on was that Pfizer used CNN as a surrogate to advertise directly to children, thereby driving consumer demand and causing the USG/CDC to purchase additional Pfizer unlicensed EUA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, I took time to review the clip more carefully and think through what was storyboarded and scripted. I am no longer confident that children were the target market — I think it was the elderly who watch TV and soak up the constant barrage of CNN fearporn regarding SARS-CoV-2.

The CNN/Sesame Street piece is actually promoting the logic that an elderly grandmother should schedule and transport her grandchild to receive an unlicensed experimental medical product, and that it is the grandmother who is advocating that the child should accept this procedure. After the shock of the realization that what was going on was that Pfizer used CNN as a surrogate to advertise directly to children, thereby driving consumer demand and causing the USG/CDC to purchase additional Pfizer unlicensed EUA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, I took time to review the clip more carefully and think through what was storyboarded and scripted. I am no longer confident that children were the target market — I think it was the elderly who watch TV and soak up the constant barrage of CNN fearporn regarding SARS-CoV-2.

The CNN/Sesame Street piece is actually promoting the logic that an elderly grandmother should schedule and transport her grandchild to receive an unlicensed experimental medical product, and that it is the grandmother who is advocating that the child should accept this procedure. Few if any have come out with such a brief, plain-speaking statement about the reality of what parents and their children are being asked or forced to do by government bureaucrats.

But so many have been subjected to so much propaganda — such intentional hypnotism — to accept the logic that it is a good idea to vaccinate our children with an experimental product that is associated with unacceptable and irreparable toxicities in order to protect the small fraction of the population at high risk of death and hospitalization. According to the latest CDC data, more than 60% of the total U.S. population has been vaccinated, and about 45% of the entire population has already been infected by the virus, recovered and developed natural immunity.

The elderly are heavily vaccinated. The vaccines do not prevent you from becoming infected, replicating high levels of virus and spreading infection to others. I will say it again — the elderly are highly vaccinated. The problem is that the vaccines are not doing what they are supposed to do — prevent infection and spread of the virus. This is even more the case with the Omicron variant.

So what to do?

Start jabbing children who — unless they have other major problems — shrug off COVID-19 disease like they do most other RNA respiratory viruses?

Or start allowing physicians to treat COVID-19 patients in the outpatient setting to prevent them from ever getting to the hospital setting where (almost exclusively in the U.S. alone) they are immunosuppressed with high levels of dexamethasone, placed into a coma-like state and hooked up to a ventilator, and treated with Remdesivir (which is clearly toxic and mimics many of the toxicities of the virus)?

This is madness.

And it reflects a profound arrogance on the part of the Pharma-Govie-World Health elite.

They assert that they understand immunology, virology and evolutionary biology so well that they can freely tinker with the lives of our children using an experimental technology and rushed vaccine product which is neither safe nor effective based on standards and bioethical consensus that have been developed and applied over decades.

They believe that they can inject novel unproven technology and improve the highly evolved human immune system that has developed over millennia to resist respiratory RNA virus pressure.

Arrogance is the kindest term I can think of. “I know no one’s going to show me everything. We all come and go unknown. Each so deep and superficial. Between the forceps and the stone. Well, I looked at the granite markers, those tributes to finality, to eternity. And then I looked at myself here. Chicken scratching for my immortality.” — Joni Mitchell “Hejira”

None of us are immortal.

Despite the objectives of the transhumanism agenda. Death cannot be avoided. We pass through this world, and hopefully, leave it a bit better when we are gone. Our children are the only true legacy, the only real form of immortality.

Please protect them, and do not ask them to make sacrifices with their health on your behalf. You know this is wrong. So do the right thing. And take this seriously.

Think long and hard before taking an action that can never be undone.

[Triple]

The science is not settled…think and use caution.

Don’t let anyone tell you that the vaccine is a moral obligation. Or a no brained on the cost / benefit.

There are numerous vaccine injuries, and the colleges with 95% vaccine rates are flush with fresh Covid cases. So the vaccine is not preventing infection or transmission.

Hospitals are filling up with vaccinated patients.

In this variant world, what are the benefits, and are they worth the risk?

[lightman]

Don’t “follow the science”...”follow the money”

The moneyed magaphone drowns the real data.

[fella]

But the Pfizer/Moderna accounting $cience says kids should get their first jab by the end of the first trimester and the second just before delivery. /sarc

[Secret Agent Man]

well they are 1/3 of the way to the truth

when they add men and women to the list, we’ll really have something there

[Triple]

Agree

[Triple]

I think attacking their weakest point is a good approach though…(gene therapy vaxxing kids that are not at risk from Covid is a bad idea.)

[Secret Agent Man]

possibly

but it really is a weak attack because it creates an unimportant distinction when you truly look at it

we are all dna coded regardless of age

its not good for any human being no matter what age

its very weak and allows an exception for a bad thing to keep occurring to groups excluded from the negative thing being discussed, and for bad science/logic to demand other groups to keep enduring the negative thing

[TigersEye]

How deadly is Covid-19 to children?

Provisional COVID-19 Deaths: Focus on Ages 0-18 Years NCHS and CDC - Data Last Updated December 15, 2021

Age group - 0 to 4 yrs; 236 deaths

Age group - 5 to 18 yrs; 535 deaths

Johns Hopkins Study Found Zero COVID Deaths Among Healthy Kids July 21, 2021

calculating accurate IFRs is important. To generate the best estimates possible, a team of scientists led by Megan O'Driscoll and Henrik Salje collected data on COVID-19 deaths in 45 countries and nearly two dozen seroprevalence studies (which determine the percentage of a population that has antibodies against the coronavirus and, hence, the percentage likely to have been infected). Using this data, they determined sex- and age-specific IFRs. (See chart.)

[Triple]

Agree, I’m not for any mandates.

But specific / targeted attacks work better than more general ones, imo.

Best,
3

[E. Pluribus Unum]

That sounds like a... dare I say it?... CONSENSUS!

[Secret Agent Man]

i dont think so

not if thats all you do

if you don’t go on to expand it relatively quickly to a general attack, you balkanize groups and reinforce the flawed notion that it is not ok for some but totally ok for others, and then you have special classes and groups and have now reinforced that this is ok to do

[353FMG]

Fauci’s advice will be followed.

[musicman]

Less Than $696 To Go!!!
The Free Republic Future
Looks Really Great
As Long As All FReepers
Remember To Donate!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[afchief]

Where does the science ever start......Let me help...THERE IS NONE.......Where are the Clinical trial details? Number of subjects? Number of controls? Randomization? Double-blind studies for these clot shots????

Public data? Public review? Side Effects data? 3-year mortality data?

BTW, any rats used in the clinical trials? How many died?
Oh, I forgot, you don’t need rats now–you got us humans to be your guinie pigs.

Long term vax mortality rate?

Who knows? Used to be part of FDA clinical trials–but somehow magically got a waiver. I guess we humans will provide the long-term mortality data. If that us the case, you can start at 20,000 + deaths
(probably much higher).

THERE IS NO SCIENCE behind these Clot shots.....NONE!!!

[Triple]

“not if thats all you do“ -sam

I agree again- this should not be only avenue.