Not quite:
Posted on 12/10/2021 10:32:18 AM PST by devane617
Sure.
After the recounts and court cases
There’s a guy on the street corner down from my house wearing 3 coats, urine stained pants and pushing a grocery cart that is doing the same thing. Sometimes restraint is the best tactic.
Not quite:
Anything like a TRUE Scotsman?
John 6:28-29 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?” Dear friends, if our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God and receive from him anything we ask, because we keep his commands and do what pleases him. And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us.
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 John 3:21-23
I would expect as much from stupid Obama. But how can I criticize Obama for foolish decisions when I see it precisely on the other side as well. Am I to suggest hypocrisy and just let things slide? That ain’t me. Sorry.
True on no choice. The inability to question or disagree with a politician is frightening to me. No man is perfect, they all make errors. But when we come down hard on one, but allow it in another or make excuses because we like them aggravates me, beyond words. Neither imply logic, but blind devotion. Still today with Clinton there is a double standard in the Epstein/Maxwell case, when both were friends with him. If we held our side to the same close eye, to the same standards perhaps DC would not be such a cesspool.
For choice, I did mean the fact our system ultimately allows only one real choice. We’re not really just picking amongst any candidates. The party system has corralled us into just 2 choices at the time it counts.
As to blind devotion…again, it’s ok to defend the candidate against commie libs, esp where they themselves are hypocritical (I was right long ago thinking that Clinton gives justification to every scummy thing any politician does). I spend much time arguing both libs and EverTrumpers.
agree on all points!
I have no idea how that relates to #160
Yeah, yeah. Another expert on all things. Go away. I am through listening to you.
I noted you completely evaded the questions. What a surprise!
Since in civil society the real nature of the Jew has been universally realized and secularized, civil society could not convince the Jew of the unreality of his religious nature, which is indeed only the ideal aspect of practical need. Consequently, not only in the Pentateuch and the Talmud, but in present-day society we find the nature of the modern Jew, and not as an abstract nature but as one that is in the highest degree empirical, not merely as a narrowness of the Jew, but as the Jewish narrowness of society.Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished.
The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.
On the Jewish Question
Okay, expert, okay. We all know how smart you are. Your the man. THE man!!! Just go away. You aren’t so damned great as you think you are in your mind. We’re done here, I don’t have time to do reruns with you to make your ego grow. Bye sweetie. Go call your Uncle Joe in the white house.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.