Posted on 12/08/2021 2:56:03 PM PST by Triple
The major advantage of mRNA vaccines over more conventional approaches is their potential for rapid development and large-scale deployment in pandemic situations. In the current COVID-19 crisis the two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been conditionally approved and broadly applied, while others are still in clinical trials. However, there is no previous experience with the use of mRNA vaccines on the large scale in general population.
This warrants a careful evaluation of mRNA vaccine safety properties by considering all available knowledge on the mRNA molecular biology and evolution. Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature, but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I showed that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition by L1 elements — the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In contrast, I found an evolutionary bias in the set of known retrocopy generating genes — a pattern that might help in the future development of retroposition-resistant therapeutic mRNAs.
I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes, and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable. This implies that we urgently need experimental studies that would rigorously test for the potential retroposition of vaccine mRNAs. At present, the insertional mutagenesis safety of mRNA-based vaccines should be considered unresolved.
The biology is clear. mRNA gene therapy can alter your genetics. It is not just purely transitory.
SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro
...Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus...
Okaaaay....
Ping
their ONLY advantage is profit.
NO ONE KNOWS the final impact of changing DNA.
and BIOpharma, the CDC, and the FDA, could not care less.
THEY are not taking the “VAX”-rapes themselves, anyway.
That is it in a nutshell.
I had the jabbs 10+ months ago. My energy levels and libido are enhanced, so I welcome the genetic changes.
Why does he assume these studies have not been done? The Covid vaccines are new, but mRNA vaccines have been tested for over 20 years. None of those tests found any genomic issues.
You know how to get to Carnegie hall…
Practice, practice, practice
You’re correct but beside profit is the element of control…money and power are always central when something doesn’t “make sense”.
The effect of all of the poisons labeled COVID vaccines is to flood the bodies of the people injected with a version of the Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein.
The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.
It is, amongst other things, like a skeleton key that can invade every part of the body.
Every cell.
Every system.
It will cause severe damage in millions of people.
For some, the effects will become apparent quickly.
For others, the effects will build over time.
At least 234,269,053 people or 71% of the population have received at least one dose.
I have not seen anyone dropping dead in streets in spite of that humongous sample size (MORE THAN THREE TIMES BIGGER than votes president Trump received in either run).
https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/
A lot of your big pharma companies are led by people who have no problem at all hurting others. In fact, there is quite a recorded history of pharma companies doing things that were plainly wrong and harmful, bribing government officials and covering up their crimes.
Were they effective though? They tested on Ebola with no conclusion. I simply don’t trust anything that has been pushed in such a way as these vaccines. Hiding side effects, deaths and other symptoms is cause for concern.
He does not assume…he knows.
Please post your 20 year history of mRNA “vaccines.”
Hint: these spike protein mRNA jabs are the FIRST. It is a fact.
Or - just post the manufacturer and disease of the first mRNA “vaccine.”
Why are you trying to educate so many ill-informed posters?
*Authorized for use in humans.
There have been several studies on this that showed integration of the mRNA into the human genome in cultured cells. Endogenous reverse transcriptase made this possible.
However one of the criticisms of the publication was that it relied on overexpression of human reverse transcriptase.
So for right now we can count this as a possibility but it needs to be confirmed in vivo.
The experimental group now is very large, so a whole genome microarray analysis MIGHT show integration, but one would have to know which cells would be the most likely to harbor the novel DNA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.