Posted on 12/04/2021 4:20:44 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
“He may have waived the Fifth by failing to assert it the first time he refused to testify. .....”
Not according to the Miranda warnings. You can assert your rights at any time and stop answering any further questions.
But the Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination — not against
public condemnation
/\
So mob rule and vigilantism
nullify
The 5th amendment ?
What a weasel supposition.
But the Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination — not against
public condemnation
/\
So mob rule and vigilantism
nullify
The 5th amendment ?
What a weasel supposition.
Does anyone believe the Post?
A little confused here; if Trump tried to “overturn the election,” wouldn’t that mean he was working to give the presidency to biden?
The only way to respond to a kangaroo court
This investigation has less meat than one of my mother-in-law’s lunchmeat sandwiches.
Is this the same Norm Eisen who masterminded the whole election strategy with Podesta? That reminds me of when they put Lisa Page on MSNBC as a commentator.
They’d have a legitimate fear of a biased DC jury pool whose members would convict any Republican in front of them regardless of facts and truth.
So much B. S., so little time...
The Left is unhinged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.