Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

What, they courts are going to now say the mandate will selectively be tossed for some groups but it’s okay for others? What sort of equal justice under the law is this?


4 posted on 11/29/2021 3:34:41 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

It’s what is commonly known as horse****.


6 posted on 11/29/2021 3:37:09 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

The case was brought on by representatives of these groups, and the courts rule only on the matter at hand.

But this is a great decision, because it also talks about the “heavy hand of the federal government” and how the government cannot enact its non-legislatively approved “mandates” through administrative (bureaucratic) means.


9 posted on 11/29/2021 3:44:28 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

the best money can buy...


13 posted on 11/29/2021 3:50:25 PM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson