Posted on 11/21/2021 6:47:13 PM PST by bitt
The Food and Drug Administration has provided its first batch of ‘confidential’ documents, in accordance with a FOIA lawsuit by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. The redacted documents were the basis of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine*,” and subsequent federal vaccine mandates.
As reported earlier, the FDA does not intend to fully release the clinical trials information used to justify its authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech ‘vaccine’ for 55 years. The non-partisan advocacy group’s sole mission is pressing for transparency in public health decision-making, such as the vaccine authorization process.
“The FDA has proposed to produce 500 pages per month which, based on its calculated number of pages, would mean it would complete its production in nearly 55 years – the year 2076,” the court filing said. “Until the entire body of documents provided by Pfizer to the FDA are made available, an appropriate analysis by the independent scientists that are members of Plaintiff is not possible.”
Two months after the lawsuit was filed, the FDA has produced the first 91 pages of the “more than 329,000 pages potentially responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request.” The findings, taken directly from the produced documents, are cited below.
“It is estimated that approximately [REDACTED] doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021,” the document states.
“Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events,” the FDA document continues. “Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866).”
Below is a General Overview of the reported outcomes to the Adverse Events:
(Excerpt) Read more at teamtuckercarlson.com ...
P
Why is any of this redacted?
Because. Shut. Up.
I read someplace that it would take that long at the current release rate. They apparently have it so the could say “Here’s the gazillion pages for ya.” and send a semi load over.
I don’t see why this can’t be finished in [REDACTED]
Bttt.
Why is any of it redacted? Because they know they did wrong.
Hey!
Redacted sounds like Retarded!
I am triggered.
2076 eh? That’s about the year Isaac Newton said would be the end of the age. Sounds about right considering how things are going.
they must be forced to produce all documents
this is clearly a stall tactic
sue their asses to comply
In this case
Redacted means CYA
These people are evil moth[REDACTED]
Probably tied to the same reason Pfizer changed 4 components of their formulation and branded it Comirnaty. Something bad happened and they fixed it. Something bad happening in drug trials is not uncommon. That's why they do trials before releasing for general use - to ensure the cure isn't worse than the disease, and to build up a knowledge base of risk factors - who is it "contra-indicated" for...
But no, the phase 3 trial included millions of unwitting test subjects. We have this conditioned response to trust our doctors and the FDA. They are trading on a reputation built up over decades of following procedures that keep us safe. They short-circuited virtually all of them with covid vaccines. Instead of a few thousand people at risk, there are a couple hundred million.
Their CYA strategy is apparently three fold. Bury the inquiries in a blizzard of paper. Redact just enough information to mask their culpability. Slow-roll their "compliance" with the ruling.
Ping
Why does it need to be redacted?
[redacted]
FOIA has exemptions for trade secrets, commercial info, etc. that were disclosed to the government during approval processes, bids, contract negotiations, and so on
This lets the government review the sensitive information and consider it during selection/approval processes while protecting the submitters from having to expose their sensitive information to competitors.
Also, information that may hurt the government’s bargaining position/strategy in subsequent contract negotiations may be exempted.
maybe the cdc should consider upgrading to electronic records
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.