Skip to comments.MRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Posted on 11/21/2021 6:46:57 AM PST by Mount Athos
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients. This report summarizes those results.
A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot.
Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac.
These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score. The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.
The Branch Covidians won’t like this.
American Heart Association Journal Circulation: Abstract 10712: MRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
I had a regular appointment with my cardiologist in October.
For what it is worth, he and his staff seemed to be more stressed than what I have observed on prior visits.
The doctor is a MAGA conservative and he and I would regularly talk politics.
My doc may be dealing with a lot of strange things happening to his patients who have been vaxxed.
Is their an English language version of this article? I can’t read medical-speak.
Noooooo! The CDC/government/media said it was safe. They would never lie to me.
Remember vividly when the first 747 was given its initial test flight. Immediately afterwards the test pilot stood outside the plane and gave a press conference. He stated that the flight went beautifully and the plane handled flawlessly. Years later it was revealed there were real and serious difficulties experienced during that test flight with the 747. When the narrative is all important, the truth does not get told. Sadly am losing confidence in the truthfulness and impartiality of the CDC, FDA and most Federal agencies. When commissars take control, it is the narrative that gets told and executed regardless of the facts.
I would send this to a friend who is a doctor at Kaiser, but he usually dismisses all this research out of hand and parrots the party line of “nothing to see here, move along”. The medical establishment all love the ‘vaccines’ and want more and more of them. My friend is already asking me if I’m having the booster. I tell him politely it’s none of his business.
I still think the jab is a meat tenderizer of some sort for when the extraterrestrial aliens invade...
You're right, as a leading Branch Covidian I don't like it at all.
COVID, OTOH, is much, much worse. You pays your money and you makes your choice.
Fauci et al will slip all involved grants to shelve this nonsense and research Climate Change’s Effect on Inflammatory Conditions.
The 70 Million+ Covid "survivors" in the US shouldn't have to make a choice.
Was this article Also in
the American Heart foundation web site?
Jab is Bad for Heart disease folks!
Various government and media data analysis have suggested that these last “deadly” COVID years of a declared “pandemic” are the worst medical tragedy to hit the nation. Hysteria ensued. And continues.
From: “U.S. Death Rate 1950-2021” one sees that these last years have not been what the hysteria has preached nonstop. One looks back to find that the death rate is within rather normal limits, better than 1950 and worse than 2008, seen as high and low. The “COVID” years are not out of the ordinary. 2015, as an example, was “worse” than a recent “COVID” year.
2021 8.977 1.090%
2020 8.880 1.120%
2019 8.782 1.120%
2018 8.685 1.220%
2017 8.580 1.240%
2016 8.475 1.270%
2015 8.369 1.270%
2014 8.264 1.290%
2013 8.159 0.090%
2012 8.152 0.090%
2011 8.145 0.090%
The behavior of this “human” virus varies widely around the world, with the US being world leader in horrid data reported, and yet looking back to Birx’ “6 %” remark, or Briand’s JHU analysis, one sees that data collection involving “presumed” and “assumed’ and other approximations and news that the mRNA “breakthrough” infections indicate these mandated injections do not work as initially advertised. They wane. They “require” in some ares of the world a fourth injection, and one drug CEO opined that mRNA would be a yearly affair. Terms are being redefined to fit a hoped-for outcome. Thus the pandemic was a creation, the antidote to it faulty, and the response from our governments around the world is lockdowns and mandates and more of the “protection” which has not protected, thus reqruing the boosters. And a criticism of Fauci is become a criticism of science. Dissent is being attacked, and other views repressed. Is this how a real pandemic works?
China through 23 months — ( 4,849 deaths since beginning of pandemic / 1,439,323,776 Chinese citizens ) x 100 = 0.0033 %
United States through 23 months — ( 763,092 deaths since beginning of pandemic / 331,002,651 ) x 100 = 0.23 %
Orders of magnitude difference in outcome by representative countries, as above.
This suggest the pandemic is not a pandemic, after all. And, per the above, 2020 has not been more “lethal” than many pre-pandemic years. The difference between 2015 and today, or the difference between the US and China can not be dismissed, without ansering a simple question. What is behind these differences. Apparently not a coronavirus. Else China’s death rate would be similaer to the US.
did you ask him if he was seeing odd stuff presenting in patients that shouldn’t have any issues?
i know that is an awkward question depending.
Thanks for posting. I have 2 brothers & a dad with heart issues. The boys are jabbed, dad is not. I pray for my brothers & jabbed humanity in general.
This bioweapon is going to cause great destruction ... at some point, perhaps people will recognize it’s the jabs ... at this time however, I see people in great denial that what appears to be a cancer epidemic popping up, and serious increases in the numbers for heart attacks, strokes, cardiac arrests & neurological issues have anything to do with the jabs. The medical community writ large is implicated in the damage & destruction. I see many “dead” people in the future: large numbers of jabbed, physicians who realize what great harm they’ve caused (the few who have a conscience left) & suicide & parents who suicide .... once the littles start dying from the jabs & they have to try to live with great guilt. One nurse reported that for the first time in her career, she had a 5 yo in the ER with myocarditis .... let that sink in as parents line up to get their little jabbed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.