Too bad we can review the mind tapes of the dead as to why they needed to be on the street causing or prompting violence. Could they have been adrenaline junkies and people who thrive on chaos? I don’t know enough about their pasts but a civil suite is going majorly examine the dead and likely not be a pretty time to see into their dark sides and the dark motivations of the plaintiffs.
RUMINT had one of the dead’s significant other in the streets with him. It will be interesting what she says under oath as to her involvement.
” why they needed to be on the street causing or prompting violence.”
Not only on the street, but to Kenosha. There’s a big deal about Kyle coming to Kenosha that night, the town he works and has immediate family, but why were his attackers that at night? What peaceful protesting is done at night?
“why they needed to be on the street causing or prompting violence. Could they have been adrenaline junkies and people who thrive on chaos?”
I read this article not too long ago that reinforced some of the points that describe psychopathic behavior.
[Paraphrased] really not giving a care or thought about anything, nothing, not even themselves and conducting themselves in any way that they, themselves want to and even afterwards not caring. Violently or not.
That is psychopathic behavior.
The rest of the article went into a historical analysis of what scientists have pondered and have analyzed and have hypothesized about and this article was kind of hitting on nutritional imbalances when they were young and up-and-coming as a possible link but that’s all theoretical hypothesis.
Can or cannot Psychologist’s proof out human thought? I would think observationally yes, but not mathematically. What does the study of human thought and behaviours use as the tools for their validation.
Perhaps, its a case of “there’s nothing new under the sun” when human behaviours, and thoughts are concerned. Recognizing behaviors might be worth a bit of a study up.