“why they needed to be on the street causing or prompting violence. Could they have been adrenaline junkies and people who thrive on chaos?”
I read this article not too long ago that reinforced some of the points that describe psychopathic behavior.
[Paraphrased] really not giving a care or thought about anything, nothing, not even themselves and conducting themselves in any way that they, themselves want to and even afterwards not caring. Violently or not.
That is psychopathic behavior.
The rest of the article went into a historical analysis of what scientists have pondered and have analyzed and have hypothesized about and this article was kind of hitting on nutritional imbalances when they were young and up-and-coming as a possible link but that’s all theoretical hypothesis.
Can or cannot Psychologist’s proof out human thought? I would think observationally yes, but not mathematically. What does the study of human thought and behaviours use as the tools for their validation.
Perhaps, its a case of “there’s nothing new under the sun” when human behaviours, and thoughts are concerned. Recognizing behaviors might be worth a bit of a study up.
the other idea you may want to add to your thought is RAD (radical attachment disorder).
Id is a debilitating disorder and in some circles a high percentage of prison inmates have this were they have issues relating to others, to include making personal connections, and could make sociopathic tendencies. All from not getting love and needs as a child even from a few days of being born.
There is a need for a loving, caring household with hopefully two parents...