Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Build Back Better -- Wasting Trillions
Townhall.com ^ | November 17, 2021 | Star Parker

Posted on 11/17/2021 3:45:57 AM PST by Kaslin

As Democrats regroup to try to pass their $2 trillion Build Back Better Act, pressure grows for shining the light of fiscal responsibility on all this.

Given resident Joe Biden's crashing approval ratings, there is some hint that the American people smell a rat.

One sign of the smell of that rat is the alarming escalation of the rate of inflation to where it hasn't been in over 30 years.

Let's start with the announcement from the Treasury Department a week ago that the revenue measures built in to finance the $2 trillion in spending will not only not add to the nation's existing fiscal deficit but will reduce it.

The headline from the Treasury department reads "Preliminary Estimates Show Build Back Better Legislation Will Reduce Deficits." The document shows an estimate of $2.151 trillion in revenue-raising measures against $2 trillion in spending.

However, the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business has its own model, overseen by a professor with extensive experience in the Congressional Budget Office and the Treasury Department. According to the Wharton model, Build Back Better will add $500 billion to the federal deficit.

Treasury says the Build Back Better cuts the deficit by $151 billion. Wharton says it increases it by $500 billion. Not exactly a trivial difference.

Who do we believe?

The Congressional Budget Office will also weigh in. But it still leaves us with the question of who to believe.

It isn't about one place having better economists than the other.

The problem is that it is impossible to make meaningful forecasts with such huge amounts of funds, all of which are highly politicized.

Anyone who has ever run a business knows what I am talking about.

I run a small business with revenues of a few million dollars a year. Even at a few million dollars a year, it is a great challenge to do accurate projections.

If it is hard at a few million, how about at $6.5 trillion, which is where the federal budget stands this year?

The corporation with the largest revenue in the country is Walmart. It's about $560 billion, or about 10% of the federal budget.

I am sure if you ask any analyst in Walmart's budgeting department, they will tell you how hard it is to project. But aside from the amounts we're talking about, there is another huge difference between what is going on in any private business, at Walmart, and at the federal government.

In private business, we are spending our own funds. In a big corporation like Walmart, they are spending their shareholders' funds. Every single individual spending and investing these funds is held personally responsible. If they are irresponsible, they get fired.

But where is the personal responsibility for the trillions being spent by the federal government?

The 100 Democrat progressives who are pushing so hard for this $2 trillion in spending have zero personal responsibility to assure that these funds are spent in an effective and responsible way. It is all politics. They dream up programs that sound so beautiful. But the realities of these programs submit to no responsible individual scrutiny.

Americans work too hard for their income on which they are paying taxes to have these funds expropriated by those who have political power but no personal responsibility.

In addition, inflation is also a tax. When the government doesn't explicitly take the funds through taxes and prints the money to meet obligations, this shows up as inflation, which then hits every working American.

In 1900, federal government non-defense spending amounted to 1.8% of our economy; in 1950, it was 10.4%; in 2000, it was 14.8%; and in 2021, it was 28.5%.

Far too much of your money and mine is being taken by politicians to wastefully spend.

Hopefully, the $2 trillion won't make it into law.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: builtbackbad; builtbackbetter; joebiden; spending

1 posted on 11/17/2021 3:45:57 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
the SAME "leaders" of treason, money-laundering, and child trafficking and murder remain in charge.


2 posted on 11/17/2021 3:50:29 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Build Back Bogus!


3 posted on 11/17/2021 3:52:06 AM PST by Boardwalk (Make this stuff upo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only thing this bill builds back better is the power structure of the Left.


4 posted on 11/17/2021 4:06:30 AM PST by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

Build on our backs better.


5 posted on 11/17/2021 4:12:59 AM PST by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I hate to defend the administration of a crooked imbecile like Biden, but these complaints from all corners of the so-called conservative media about the stupid $1.75 trillion “infrastructure bill” are falling on deaf ears.

You wouldn’t hear a peep out of these people if this was a Republican President pissing away $1.75T in IRAQ or AFGHANISTAN.

6 posted on 11/17/2021 4:18:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

build back bankrupt


7 posted on 11/17/2021 4:22:26 AM PST by exnavy (we are not a democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A4-FDC817-4-E58-4-C36-8-FE6-64-F2-F94-BFD36
8 posted on 11/17/2021 4:45:46 AM PST by The Louiswu (Peace to you and may God Bless you all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Libtards think the more they spend the more they save 🤪


9 posted on 11/17/2021 6:23:48 AM PST by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Dude - the entire Iraq war cost was about 1 trillion and not everyone (like Trump) thought that was a great idea.


10 posted on 11/17/2021 6:26:44 AM PST by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NWFree

“… for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle”.

Winston Churchill


11 posted on 11/17/2021 6:27:03 AM PST by SMARTY (Republics decline into democracies & democracies degenerate into despotisms. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NWFree

And? The infrastructure bill Biden just signed has something like $550 billion in new spending above the current baseline … spread over TEN YEARS.


12 posted on 11/17/2021 6:38:23 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Better Before Biden

(heard that on the radio this AM)


13 posted on 11/17/2021 7:48:09 AM PST by Vinnie ( L g Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Build back better plan by someone who never built anything or had a job how good can that be.


14 posted on 11/17/2021 9:08:07 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The government needs to make one major change in spending; one that most private citizens use. First, you see how much money comes in, remembering that with the government more taxes generally means less actual revenue. Less taxation can mean more actual revenue. The main concern is that you do not spend money that you don’t have & won’t likely even get. We have for many years seen what that gets us....more & more deficit & debt, to the point where it’s now completely out of hand. It’s a big problem trying to figure a way to get from where we are now to where we need to get. I guess the government can set a POTENTIAL/PROPOSED budget, but then cut back or cut out certain items when they find out the funds aren’t there. With the amount of waste built into federal budgets, this should be doable.


15 posted on 11/17/2021 10:36:38 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson