Posted on 11/15/2021 2:37:24 AM PST by Kaslin
Back when the experts didn’t know if the new vaccines would even be “effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections,” the government, media, corporations, and public health intelligentsia still relentlessly pushed the stuff on Americans while proclaiming that they were 90-percent effective, and Dr. Anthony Fauci openly presumed that we’d “really need for 75-to-85-percent of the population to get vaccinated to achieve herd immunity.”
All of that information can be found in a single article from December of 2020. Today, we’ve hit Dr. Fauci’s once-supposed sweet spot for vaccination rates (among adults, at least), thanks to a propaganda campaign that neglected to publicize any potential risks while promoting benefits which have proven to be impossible to attain.
There was never any proven evidence that the vaccines were effective in staving off COVID infections. Yet we now know what was unknown then, even as they pushed for four-in-five Americans’ becoming vaccinated, and that is that the vaccines are not at all effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections.
That’s right. Get the vaccine, or don’t get the vaccine, and you can still get symptomatic infections while presenting the risk of infection to others.
How likely you are to go to the hospital and/or die from infection is still greatly dependent upon your age and health preconditions. If you’re older or happen to be unhealthy, you’re more likely to die from COVID infection, even if vaccinated. If you’re younger and healthy, you are extremely unlikely to experience hospitalization or death, vaccinated or not.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
How can we possibly ever attain "herd immunity" if there continue to be numerous populations of wild animals (snow leopards, minks, white-tailed deer, etc.) - and even domestic dogs and cats - that will serve as reservoirs of the dread bug?
Won't we have to first inject all those wild animals, and give them regular boosters?
Regards,
Nicely put into words.
My question - you get the rona, miraculously survive, become naturally immune, and then start the clot shots. What does that do to the body? Can’t be good...
I know several coworkers who did exactly that. One of them seems to have no suffered any ill effects. The other, however, has been on again, off again with PTO, leaves work early often, and often sounds like they just woke up on conference calls.
It's unconscionable to me that someone who had a verified case would also get a shot. It flies in the face of every lesson ever taught in high school biology. This whole thing tells me our public education systems around the world have failed us, or at least 50% of the population were asleep that week.
I would say that FIRST.
The vaccine hoax is quickly becoming an inconvenient lie.
F Joe is pushing the vax because the mandate polls well. Once the realization sets in the vax offers very little benefit against the risks of adverse effects, the polls will turn negative. Not to mention, F Joe thinks the unvaccinated are Trump supporters. Dems relish the chance of making us lepers.
I’m part of one control group - the wife is of another.
Why would this person actually believe that 80 percent of the Americans are vaccinated?
Not just an ‘inconvenient lie’, Pontiac. But, rather more likely a truly nefarious plot driven by Faux-chi and his flying monkeys to bring mRNA vaccines into universal deployment without even knowing the long term implications. We are nothing more than lab rats in this one.
If that were not true, then why was the very FIRST proposal to deal with the scamdemic to find VACCINES, which take weeks or months to become fully effective, at the expense of TREATMENTS and THERAPEUTICS to save lives and hasten recovery while yeilding natural immunity?
This is playing out much as the PTB wish, right down to the damnable and faulty mandates, whether mask or vax mandates.
It’s well past time that people stand up to this horrendous overreach by FedGov, Faux-chi, and the Big Pharma money grubbers.
Same here. Yet we both had COVID at the same time.
I hope the FReepers who choose to kneel and kiss Fauci’s feet start to get the message😎
Neither of us.
The clinical trials on the shot eliminated the control group by offering them the shot. The unvaxxed now are the only control group with living proof for the shot’s ineffectiveness.
Very interesting article.
“Pure Blood” here. And will stay that way.
But I’m on HCQ and IVM, prophylactically. Yup,the “Horse paste” lol. For real.
I’m a Pure Blood too. I have some IVM paste stashed in case I get exposed or come down with the RONA COOF. Also Fish Zithro..
Taking a multiple vitamin, Cod Liver Oil, and extra Vitamin D3,C,Zinc, and Quercetin. Have some XClear nasal spray, and any other OTC meds that might help.
Don’t think I’ve had it so far.
Doesn’t fit the fact the CDC acknowledges there are 142M natually immune victims of CoVID out of 330M total population. Hardly 80% of population. CDC also admits it does not collect data on the naturally immune.
Now what would be the justification of doing this??? They already had emergency use authorization from the FDA to use their mRNA gene therapy drug. So it was not an issue of having to be in a big rush to get their product to market. Could it be that they had something to hide??? If so, what were they trying to hide?
It is very likely that they were trying to hide what they knew to be certain possible side effects of the mRNA gene therapy drug that followed from the results of the biodistribution tests which were required by the Japanese counterpart to our own FDA (PMDA) for approval of their drug. Japan requires more data than our own FDA for approval of drugs.
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., managed to gain access to Pfizer’s own biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. Probably through the Japanese equivalent of FOIA. The research, previously unseen and reportedly intended to remain confidential, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines.
https://scientific.healthcare/interview/dr-byram-bridle/
________________________
What’s more, TrialSite News reports6 that Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency [EMA] reveal the company “did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies … as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP).”
Neither reproductive toxicity nor genotoxicity (DNA mutation) studies were performed, both of which are considered critical when developing a new drug or vaccine for human use. The problems now surfacing matter greatly, as they significantly alter the risk-benefit analysis underlying the vaccines’ emergency use authorization.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.