Posted on 11/10/2021 8:07:36 AM PST by Red Badger
You can rewind live video to see earlier testimony
Alternate Live Feed from Patriot Lawyers
VIDEO AT LINK............
Thank you kindly. This trial is riveting and watching the media narrative crumble is gratifying. Though I know juries are unpredictable it must be reassuring to the defense.
I trust there’s someone on that jury that knows that FMJ rounds are commonly called TARGET rounds, which is what Kyle and his friend were using the gun for.
It would have been funny if Kyle would have gotten his digs by responding to the question regarding a pistol over a rifle that it would be unlawful to carry concealed without a permit.
He should probably stop and think for a moment that "Mike Nifong" is one of those names he may end up linked to.
Actually, I heard that the prosecutor's actions may be specifically designed to tank the case and get a mistrial which is why the defense suggested that they are considering a motion for "mistrial with prejudice".
i watch it live here-—
https://www.wpbstv.org/watch-live-kyle-rittenhouse-trial-for-kenosha-shooting-continues-day-7/
Because of his skin color?
Yeah, I thought of that too. I was hoping Kyle would say that they just brought the target ammunition. It would give lie to the notion that he and the others came there to kill people.
Yeah, I think I’m as nervous as Kyle. He’s doing good though and Binger just comes across as a jerk. Whether or not Kyle should have been there is irrelevant. Type of ammo is irrelevant.
The defense needs to be objecting more.
Of course we don't know for sure yet, but for a .45 Long Colt, I'd wager it was a cast lead bullet with no copper jacket, the most common loading for the .45 Long Colt.
Hard cast lead will not deform very much if at all when striking soft tissue, and is often used when deep penetration is desired.
There should be a Directed Verdict of “NOT GUILTY” on ALL counts.................
How do you know this about the jury
I missed the voire speculations on this case.
"He shouldn't have taken the stand" is complete BS.
Whittaker Chambers once said:
"Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does."
My heart breaks for him. He will be traumatized for life doing what he had to do, the right thing to do. God comfort and protect him.
No truth to that in general. Might be truth to that in a case wehre an affirmative defense is the only way to be acquitted, but I imagine a self-defense case can be made with witnesses and facts that don;t depend on defendant testimony at trial.
Defense talking motion for mistrial with prejudice!!!
Yeah the media initially said sandmann intimidated and mocked the Indian guy, but the real truth was backwards. Sandmann just stood his ground and rightly so.
Please update the thread when the trial resumes, the refresh button is making my finger tired.
Defense Chirafisi: Making motion for mistrial with prejudice.
Back on. Defense talking motion for mistrial with prejudice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.