Skip to comments.
What You Need to Know About Comirnaty
Based Underground ^
| November 7, 2021
| Dr. Joseph Mercola
Posted on 11/07/2021 6:27:49 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same
- A licensed vaccine is not shielded from liability until or unless it’s added to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule by the CDC. So, if you were injured by Comirnaty, you could sue Pfizer. You cannot sue if injured by the EUA Pfizer shot (or any of the other EUA COVID injections)
- Even though several hundred claims have been filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for injuries resulting from the COVID shots — which is the only possible avenue to obtain damages — not a single claim has been paid out
- Natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wanes within a few months. The shots may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with COVID
- Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway. Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but the CHD has not given up and is still pursuing the case
(Excerpt) Read more at basedunderground.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cdc; comirnaty; liability; liable; moremercolanonsense; pfizer
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the sameI'll go further, the ingredients are not the same. 4 ingredients in the EUA have been replaced by one ingredient in Comirnaty. Do they do the same thing, who cares? They are not the same.
2
posted on
11/07/2021 6:31:42 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(I will not do business with fascists)
To: frogjerk
I know for a fact that when a supplement provider changes the ingredients of a product, they have to change the name.
They are more stringent on vitamin makers than they are on actual drug makers.
3
posted on
11/07/2021 6:37:14 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
4
posted on
11/07/2021 6:37:42 AM PST
by
Theophilus
(Coercion Is Not Consent)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway.Which specific law is this in violation of? I have heard this claim made but have not seen the specifics.
5
posted on
11/07/2021 6:38:07 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(I will not do business with fascists)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Furthermore, let's look at the actual FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech info to assess just what this elixir is supposed to do.
Per the FDA's website,
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.(emphasis added)
Per the Comernity Insert,
--------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE----------------------------
COMIRNATY is a vaccine indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (1)(emphasis added>
Per the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action, under "Indication"
Active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (Emphasis added)
Clearly, the vaccine is for PREVENTION. Nothing else.
All of the clinical trials (limited as they were) and statistical confidence intervals were focused on Vaccine Efficacay with regard to PREVENTION...not hospitalization, not ER visits, and not symptoms.
I'll say it again. If you're inclined to get the shot to avoid getting the virus because you're in a high-risk group, that's your call and IMHO nobody should call you sheeple..but in return, don't call those who don't get the shot a bunch of whackos because they, among other things, object to the shots being incorrectly claimed as being approved to keep you out of the hospital.
6
posted on
11/07/2021 6:58:45 AM PST
by
DoodleBob
(Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2 )
To: DoodleBob
If you're inclined to get the shot to avoid getting the virus because you're in a high-risk group, that's your call and IMHO nobody should call you sheeple..but in return, don't call those who don't get the shot a bunch of whackos because they, among other things, object to the shots being incorrectly claimed as being approved to keep you out of the hospital. Many of us have advocated this exact position from the very beginning. The fact that it has to be restated now as such a piece of common sense that everyone should have followed it from the beginning is truly sad to have to say here on Free Republic.
7
posted on
11/07/2021 7:04:58 AM PST
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It gets confusing. Pfizer says Conmurinaty IS the same drug currently being given under the EUA.
USA today says it is false to say Comurnitay is not being made in USA( not that they are to be believed.
Is it possible Pfizer wants to continue under the immunity protection of EUA?
8
posted on
11/07/2021 7:12:26 AM PST
by
RWGinger
(Does anyone else really )
To: RWGinger
Sorry for the misspelling
9
posted on
11/07/2021 7:13:02 AM PST
by
RWGinger
(Does anyone else really )
To: RWGinger
They say that, but it has different ingredients.
If you change the ingredients of a supplement you have to change the name.
Same thing with a drug.
It’s got a different name because it has different ingredients.
That means it’s not the same.
10
posted on
11/07/2021 7:24:02 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Makes sense
So I wonder if Pfizer is making Comirnaty in USA
If they are and it has been approved by FDA why isn’t it being given?
Something strange
11
posted on
11/07/2021 10:22:22 AM PST
by
RWGinger
(Does anyone else really )
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson