Posted on 11/05/2021 5:24:04 AM PDT by Politically Correct
Prosecutorial ethics. Roughly don't bring a case unless the facts incline to a guilty verdict. Prosecutor is supposed to have a grasp on affirmative defense side too, self defense in this case - but the ethical rules do not say this expressly. Bringing a case solely due to political pressure is an ethical violation.
There is generally no penalty or risk for making an ethical violation. The rule is a paper tiger. ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct -- there is probably a state version of this
The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:Rule 5-110 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor(A) Not institute or continue to prosecute a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;
(B) Make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;
(C) Not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights unless the tribunal has approved the appearance of the accused in propria persona;
(D) Make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that the prosecutor knows or reasonably should know tends to negate the guilt of the accused, mitigate the offense, or mitigate the sentence, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal; and ...
Malicious compliance on behalf of the AD? Interesting.
Isn’t that called “Badgering the Witness?”
Simple. Succinct. Accurate. You sir have a firm grasp on the solution.
Very strange- the number of people (5) from the same family-Antaramian family- connected to the prosecution.
I think a book deal may be in his future. This isn’t the same as Zimmerman. Too many people see this kid as a hero. I certainly do.
Maybe politics is in his future.đ
There is another message being sent by the prosecution: yeah we may lose this case but we sure Fâd this kids life up didnât we?
Sometimes we learn the most from the things that hurt us the most.
“If there is a next time the right properly uses force of violence in self defense, this prosecutor would charge them, too.”
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, almost every major study on defensive gun use has found that Americans use their firearms defensively between 500,000 and 3 million times each year. Thereâs good reason to believe that most defensive gun uses are never reported to law enforcement, much less picked up by local or national media outlets.
https://datavisualizations.heritage.org/firearms/defensive-gun-uses-in-the-us/
Well, look at that. That means between 500,000 and 3 million defensive uses of weapon were NOT prosecuted.
All democrats, including DA lawyers, are the enemy. Treat them as such.
Don’t celebrate yet. Juries can be fickle and juries can completely ignore the evidence as they did in the OJ case and the George Floyd “murder” case.
Seems to me these prosecutors need to be ousted from their jobs.
Agree this is in part to keep anyone else from helping to quell the ANTIFA/BLM riots.
Yes, the prosecutor was leading a witness that refused to be led.
Isn’t that called leading the witness?đ¤
When the Germans attacked?đ
Wonât have to. Thereâs already a $2 million dollar bail that was put up. Kyle is under no obligation to return it once he is acquitted.
Wonât have to. Thereâs already a $2 million dollar bail that was put up. Kyle is under no obligation to return it once he is acquitted.
Germans, ChiComs, Soros, some English officials.
The dispersion is broad and they are powerful enough to hard to prove were involved.
The Germans are still certain that they must rule Europe, and would prefer to rule the world. Totalitarianism appeals to their leaders.
{The prosecution's] job in this particular case is not to win. It is to make it clear to a large enough part of the BLM/ANTIFA/leftist part of the population that, when the case against Kyle loses handily (which is inevitable), this one does not rise to the level of their ârighteous indignationâ - and subsequent rioting
* * *
Wow, what you say makes a lot of sense. The public is being played to prevent another round of burning down cities.
In fact the photo of the prosecutor released today of his reaction to the witness admitting he aimed his weapon at Rittenhouse at the 3-foot range suggests the prosecutor is overacting.
They’ll have to change their names and leave town when they lose — otherwise it’ll be analogous to what happened with that “autogoal” goalie back in the 1980s down in S America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.