Posted on 11/01/2021 11:55:23 AM PDT by JonPreston
SNIP
They found that a person who received the vaccine was 3.5 times as likely to develop brain blood clots as an average person before the pandemic.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Americans who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine are 3.5 times as likely to develop blood clots, Magnum44 wrote: |
There is never enough real information in these claims. If you tell me that the risk of clots goes up for the J&J shot, its kind of important to say, is that during the first few days or two weeks after the shot, or throughout eternity? I suspect its a reaction from some in the first few days, and if you havent been effected in the first two weeks, you probably never will be. But I am not a doctor and I would expect those writing about this stuff would include such pertinent information. |
There's more than enough real information in these claims. Look how much information wasn't available about the 'vaccines' after 2 months of a stage 3 trial on 40 thousand people? The trials had zero severe adverse events according to Pfizer, after the company was permitted to test their own product and report their own results without oversight.
SO ZERO blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, neurological problems, autoimmunity etc. in those tiny little 2 month Covid 'vaccine' trials on healthy people, with the pharma companies filing FDA approval applications specifying they had data gaps including transmission, infectivity pregnancy and co-morbidity and the vaccine, based on technology that failed since 2004, was rolled out world-wide.
CDC's Walenksy gets in front of a camera months ago and told pregnant women to get the vaccine because, "We're seeing evidence that the product is safe and effective." No evidence presented, experimental vaccines being imposed on unmilling people via mandates and no one in any official capacity or in the media has the least hesitancy stating as fact that it's 'safe and effective.'
But if after 11 months of administration, people evaluate a specific harm and state the risk is higher for the vaccinated based on actual patient information, knowing that the information is heavily censored and doctors are punished for stating it publicly, suddenly there's just never enough information for 'these claims.'
Sampled data which makes it past the censors is portrayed as the total number among all vaccinations world-wide when it is in fact the tip of the iceberg that emerged in spite of censors, with complete efforts at suppression rather than collection among all official channels. "So it's just X among some x number million?" as if 'everybody knows' there's only one-side effect and 100% of all instances have been publicly acknowledged.
Double standards - the vax get's a pass while anyone who sickens or dies from it is denied, minimized, ridiculed as exaggeration. Suddenly people want 'more proof.' Hey maybe the long-term studies vaccines usually have over the course of about 12 years before it's ever offered to the public would have been a good idea?
I’ll presume you aren’t ranting at me. I was only commenting on the stated claim that blood clots were 3.5 times as likely with J&J. I was asking as likely as ‘what?’
Well, sue the bastards…oh…wait…
I believe the study referenced today stated that the highest risk period was approximately 15 days after the vaccine was administered.
Betcha for Pfizer it’s 10 times that…
Thanks, that makes sense as the mRNA or dRNA used in the jabs is supposed to only survive for about that length of time.
Right. No problem.
It's well worth the risk (plus the many other known possible lethal and dangerous side effects) to keep from getting fired and go about your "normal" life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
MSM using “several” in their headlines, but everyone could get jabbed again!
1 Nov: Brisbane Times Australia: Several people given ultra-low dose of vaccine at Qld pop-up clinic
by Cloe Read
Several people were given an ultra-low dose of a COVID-19 vaccine after an error at a pop-up clinic south of Brisbane where 175 jabs were administered.
On Monday, Queensland Health said it contacted 175 people who received the Pfizer vaccine at the Flagstone Community College on Saturday, October 23.
Of the people, 148 were receiving their first dose and 27 were receiving their second dose.
Six people received a low dose because of a vaccine preparation error.
“The Pfizer vaccine requires a process of preparation, where saline is added to the vaccine vial and withdrawn to make up to six doses,” Queensland Health said in a statement.
“An initial review indicated one vial was used twice, meaning the doses drawn on the second use were over-diluted.
“Unfortunately there is no ability to trace which six of the 175 people through the vaccination pop-up clinic were given the ultra-low dose, and we will contact all those impacted to discuss revaccination, if required.”...
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/several-people-given-ultra-low-dose-of-vaccine-at-qld-pop-up-clinic-20211101-p5951p.html
endless and meaningless gobbledygook, of the kind taxpayer-funded ABC loves:
2 Nov: ABC Australia: Families will be forced to isolate for 14 days at home if just one member gets COVID-19 in Queensland
By Lexy Hamilton-Smith
With Queensland slowly edging towards its vaccination targets, those who have had two doses will still have to quarantine for two weeks if they get COVID-19.
As will their family, which means partners and their children, or flatmates or grandparents, if they live in the same home and are deemed at risk.
But what about “close contacts” — like a teacher or a doctor who comes into contact with someone who gets the dangerous Delta variant?...
Queensland Health Minister Yvette D’Ath said “opening up” will only work if the state continues to test, trace, isolate and quarantine.
“So we expect certainly at the 70 per cent and 80 per cent [of Queenslanders over 16 that have had two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine] … will still be quarantining for 14 days, based on advice from the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee until that advice changes.
“If the advice is you can then quarantine for a shorter period of time, or you do not need to put as many people into quarantine if they are close contacts, then we will take that advice.”...
“People who are fully vaccinated may still be able to go to work if they are a close contact,” she said...
New territory with boosters on the way
(University of Queensland virologist Kirsty Short) said the advice was changing every day in terms of the data.
“You look at the situation of boosters for every member of the population and that is going to change how the vaccine works and the efficacy of it,” she said.
“It increases the efficacy of the vaccine against severe disease but it also increases your protection against getting the illness.
“But what we do not know is how long that lasts.”...
She said as January approached, more people would be up for the booster shot...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-02/qld-coronavirus-isolation-living-with-covid19/100585628
Nothing to see here. Move along.
I don’t even see where the Novavax is given in my state (AZ).
Figures....
I don’t even see where the Novavax is given in my state (AZ).
—
I think it is still in the approval process.
Thanks :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.