Posted on 10/27/2021 6:31:50 AM PDT by artichokegrower
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met yesterday (10/26/21) to discuss recommending an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer vaccine against Covid-19 in children ages 5 to 11. The panel voted 17-0 in favor.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearscience.com ...
Come on doctor. Don't confuse me with the facts.
Not with my kids.
Once again, you are correct.
People who say “show me data” generally don’t understand data.
It is statistically impossible to improve upon children’s natural recovery from COVID. 99.999997 I believe. NO drug will ever do better than that. https://t.co/LoNVQPl6at— Dr Mollie James (@molsjames) October 27, 2021
FDA Voting Member:
“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.”
FDA Committee has approved the Pfizer vaccine Emergency Use Authorization for kids aged 5-11. In making this decision, the FDA conceded it does not know the long-term risks to these kids.
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1453094486746275854
Both the adenovirus based cloning vector and organically coated mRNA approaches to provoking an immune response are quite novel and have easily enumerated long term risks, many of which should have been tested during development.
The ones that have been tested were not good(not by developers, but by UK and Japanese govt): e.g. bio-distribution for mRNA--
does it stay in skeletal muscle cells near the injection site? (NO, it goes everywhere),
does it cross the blood-brain barrier (YES, this is so bad it should immediately be pulled).
this shouldn’t even be under discussion. Kids don’t need it.
“Not with my kids.”
***********************
Not with ANY kids except for those whose parents want the shots… perhaps because their child has a co-morbidity. NO MANDATES!
FDA Committee has approved the Pfizer vaccine Emergency Use Authorization for kids aged 5-11. In making this decision, the FDA conceded it does not know the long-term risks to these kids.
—
Don’t think of them as children. Think of them as beagles.
You won’t find out what’s what’s in the bill until you pass it , sound familiar?
When I hear someone in my circle of friends and business associates use the term "follow the science," I can say that in every case it is used by an ignoramus who works in a profession where science is little more than gibberish and is a total mystery to those who claim to promote it -- law, advertising, real estate, non-profit organization, etc.
[[does it cross the blood-brain barrier (YES, this is so bad it should immediately be pulled). ]]
Why aren’t, layers arguing this (and other important medical,facts about the vaccine, like blood c.ots, heart problems etc) before the courts?
Fen fen came on the market, caused some deaths and other issues if I remember right, and it got quickly yanked because of that, but increasing evidence showing that the vaccines might be da group and should never be mandated as a result until further testing can be made, seems to go ignored.
Aybe ther are lawsuits, but if so, they are being low key about it. I wojld think that alarm bel.s woild be sounded by concerned doctors and lawyers to at the very .east put the brakes on till more is known. Other countries are slamming the brakes on, but ours is going ful, steam ahead as though there are. NO concerns
Vaccine mandates are understandable if they actually stop the spread of viruses. COVID shots don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.