Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourtySeven
But they could never produce forensic evidence of wrongdoing

Though Giuliani had over a thousand affidavits of poll workers and voters attesting to wrongdoing. Doesn't have to be forensic evidence.

9 posted on 10/18/2021 5:29:11 AM PDT by TheCipher (To my mind Judas Iscariot was nothing but a low, mean, premature Congressman. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher
Giuliani didn't have a shred of evidence that would have held up in a court of law. That's why he always had to attest in the various court hearings after Election Day that he had no evidence of fraud.

There was no way in hell to fix the problem with the 2020 election once the Electoral College vote of mid-December was done. Look what just happened in Arizona: it took about TEN MONTHS for a SINGLE COUNTY to complete a forensic audit that would have been needed in every contested state last year.

14 posted on 10/18/2021 5:34:16 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson