Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allendale; Secret Agent Man; vpintheak; lastchance; BenLurkin; Theo; aMorePerfectUnion; lightman; ..
Though you state the case for vaccines in a reasonable way which I agree with, the fundamental issue in this case is not whether the vaccine works or doesn't work.

The real issue is whether a government can force a citizen against their will to submit to an invasive medical procedure except in extreme cases, and even then.

A government that can force to you submit to an invasive medical procedure, quarantine, limit on freedom of movement or association, or shut down a private business for a pathogen with a fatality risk comparable to COVID-19 has no limitation on what it can force citizens to do.

Or what it will do to them.

If COVID-19 had a fatality rate of even 10-20% (never mind 30-50% which Smallpox or Bubonic Plague approach or exceed) we wouldn't be having these kinds of discussions.

If COVID-19 were that deadly, people would be clamoring for a vaccine, any vaccine (even one that had a 40% success rate and carried serious side effects) we would be voluntarily quarantining, and even barricading ourselves in our domiciles which we would protect with firearms from unwanted infected people (which in this case could be both vaccinated and unvaccinated people)

But COVID-19 is NOT that pathogen.

Bottom Line: We should protect those who need it and wish to be protected, and those who are vulnerable and unable to make the choice themselves. And those protections should range from quarantines and vaccines to effective treatments, whatever is available.

80 posted on 10/18/2021 4:26:52 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists are The Droplet of Sewage in a gallon of ultra-pure clean water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

—If COVID-19 had a fatality rate of even 10-20% (never mind 30-50% which Smallpox or Bubonic Plague approach or exceed) we wouldn’t be having these kinds of discussions.

TBut it was fatality rates that high, and higher, that drove the vaccine development.
“Adjusted mortality from COVID-19 decreased from 25.6% in March 2020 to 7.6% in August 2020”
https://www.cdc.gov/library/covid19/pdf/2020-11-24-Science-Update_FINAL_public.pdf

I saw somewhere that SoAfrica was up around 43% initially. It was scary.

In-hospital treatment has become more fine-tuned, meds more targeted, as time passed and research papers cranked out. Vaccination has taken hold, (and, some may argue, the social distancing/handwashing/self-awareness etc. measures adopted contributed) and the death rate dropped from 7..6% in August 2020 to 1.8% and now hovering around 1.6% ontheaverage. It will likely drop further. But that’s not where we started. And as you said, with a 20% mortality people would be clammoring for a vaccine and indeed, they did. With elites elbowing seniors out of the way for it.

It’s a known that the virus is able to inflict damage from day one. So, while a person may survive, and not even be symptomatic, there is still the factor of short or long term disability. As in war, some of those who might have died in the 24% mortality group had they caught the disease earlier in the year, but were saved by medical advances, are still casualties - walking wounded. And that also has to be considered when judging the impact of the virus itself, rather than pointing to a mortality rate that has changed over time.

just my thoughts


88 posted on 10/18/2021 4:58:09 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

I don’t support any vaccine mandate period. It’s a personal choice, not government.


89 posted on 10/18/2021 5:03:26 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

“The real issue is whether a government can force a citizen against their will to submit to an invasive medical procedure.”

Yes. That is the bottom line. Absolutely.


91 posted on 10/18/2021 5:05:07 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (When government fears the people, there is liberty. Don't forget his cohort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
Husband repents on deathbed 'Mom, I love you and I wish that I'd got the shot'

"Repents"; It really is a religion for the godless.

93 posted on 10/18/2021 5:39:44 AM PDT by Pollard (PureBlood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

That makes the most sense both from a medical point of view and a civil liberties view.


102 posted on 10/18/2021 7:26:53 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Amen


113 posted on 10/18/2021 10:34:55 AM PDT by vpintheak (Live free, or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Emphatically agree. Well said.


114 posted on 10/18/2021 10:43:27 AM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

i generally agree with your last bottom line statement

with the caveat i don’t want anything forced on anyone who doesn’t want it, people gave to determine their own kedical risks without one “choice” resulting in punitive treatment and penalites by society

because then its just bullying and govt coercion

and that’s not a real choice, its under duress and fear of threats by a govt with essentially infinite resources to throw at you


118 posted on 10/18/2021 1:57:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson