Posted on 10/13/2021 8:38:06 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.
By a concerned reader
The 5 PHE tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report, separated by 4 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.
People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.
Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people…
Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months. 30-50 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.
The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).
(Excerpt) Read more at theexpose.uk ...
Well, I had the vaccine nearly a year ago.
If I have no immune system, I’d know by now. If this article was true, hundreds of millions would already be dead.
It’s also complete bull spit. Millions have been vaccinated for more than 6 months and we would be admitting them all with opportunistic infections not to mention regular bacterial and viral infections if this was even close to true. But hey it makes great headlines
Yes, it's quite frustrating trying to get a clear picture of the situation in the U.S. But in drilling down a bit into the death statistics reported out by the CDC, an interesting pattern or signal might be emerging, but I'm not sure.
Take the last four months of 2021. According to the CDC, reporting out death certificate information provided to it through the National Vital Statistics System, the total number of deaths *involving COVID for June, July, August, and September 2020 was 98,140. By way of comparison, the total number of deaths involving COVID for June, July, August, and September of this year was 114,261 -- i.e., an increase of 16%. An increase, even though, of course, nobody in the U.S. had been vaccinated in 2020, whereas millions have been as of today.
But that 16% increase isn't the most interesting thing. Rather, when one looks closer, one detects that there was something of a dramatic change this past August. Namely, the total number of deaths involving COVID for June and July of this year (i.e., 18,722) was some 62% lower than the total number of deaths involving COVID for June and July of last year (i.e., 49,118). Indeed, June 2021 saw the lowest number of monthly deaths involving COVID since the very onset of the pandemic (i.e., March 2020, where 7,160 such deaths were recorded).
But, when one looks at deaths involving COVID starting in August of this year, a different picture emerges. The total number of such deaths in August and September of this year (i.e., 95,489) is some 95% higher than in August and September of 2020 (i.e., 49,022). And for the month of September alone, the figures for 2021 (i.e., 49,126 as of today; the CDC updates these most recent numbers as more data comes in) are a startling 157% higher than in September 2020 (i.e., 19,138).
That is to say, comparing the early summer months (June and July) of 2021 to those same months in 2020 (again, when no one was as yet vaccinated), things looked good: a significant decline in deaths involving COVID. But then the bottom seems to have fallen out starting around August of this year.
Perhaps some of this can be explained by the country as a whole being less "locked down" now than a year ago. But, at least where I live, things began to open back up this past spring, before the "Delta scare" saw the reimposition of indoor mask requirements and whatnot. That change, as I recall, kicked in near the beginning of August around here.
In any event, to my eye, something seems to have gone off the rails. "Waning efficacy" of the vaccines strikes me as a possible explanation (although by no means the only one). But, mind, note that we'd be talking "efficacy" in terms of "preventing death," not merely "preventing infection" or even "preventing hospitalization." Whatever the explanation, by the CDC's own most recent numbers, there was a 157% increase in deaths involving COVID this past month compared to September 2020, when no one had yet been vaccinated.
Something's wrong.
_________
*The CDC defines "deaths involving COVID" in these terms: "Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1."
people facing termination from their jobs for refusing vaccines, should be asking their employers “Why are you requiring me to take something that is causing heart problems, clots, organ issues, and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome? Do i need to take you folks to court for firing me for refusing to take something that is turning out to be more dangerous to me than covid?”
Where the heck are the lawyers on this issue? Forcing kids to take something that is causing health issues? Where are the judges demanding that an investigation be made into the fact that these vaccines are causing problems and still people pushing them on children?
Little Nero Newsome should be sued for endangering the welfare of children by demanding they be vaccinated just to go to school- but of course the weasel left himself wiggle room by saying that those that don’t want the vaccine can do ‘remote learning’
In any event, to my eye, something seems to have gone off the rails. “Waning efficacy” of the vaccines strikes me as a possible explanation (although by no means the only one). But, mind, note that we’d be talking “efficacy” in terms of “preventing death,” not merely “preventing infection” or even “preventing hospitalization.” Whatever the explanation, by the CDC’s own most recent numbers, there was a 157% increase in deaths involving COVID this past month compared to September 2020, when no one had yet been vaccinated.
Something’s wrong.
Great summary analysis.
Karl Denninger has been questioning where the work force has gone.
He makes an interesting connection, here.....
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243839
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.....
Not to be confused with HIV AIDS
/
/
Seriously ?
That like saying you have a Ford car
But thank God it’s not a dodge car
It’s still a car
And its still AIDS
( even if they didn’t acronym it )
So Saint Fauci The Noble ( liar)
Who made his name decades ago promising to cure aids with a vaccine
Instead
Funded the creation of a virus who’s vaccine he has a patent on that gives people aids.
Figures.
What a schmuck.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully this effect will wear off as the vaccine itself wears off more completely, and the immune system, without a “booster” shot of the vaccine, will begin to recover.
Big Pharma will make billions selling AIDS drugs next.
I’m breaking out the champagne.
Gas Dr. just passed away.
Whoever created the covid pathogen inserted some HIV proteins into it.
Guess who holds the patent on those proteins?
Fau….cough cough….ci
So they'll then be in the same state as the unvaccinated? They got a year's worth of protection from Covid and that's somehow a bad thing?
“So they’ll then be in the same state as the unvaccinated?”
No, I think the article argues that their normal immune system is destroyed at that rate, and like someone with AIDS, Acquired imuno-deficiency, the person is left vulnerable to every normal disease that the body could fight off.
The shot hijacks the normal immune system and replaces it with their version.
That is what the article argues at least.
Has anyone seen a commercial for the specific “vaccines?” Not a generic commercial saying we are all in this together bullsh!t, but one like any other drug on the market?
What would the potential side effects voice over sound like?
You will never see a commercial for the “vaccine”
The potential side effects would take several minutes to read out I bet.
Takin the experiment jab is kinda like downloading new software that overwrites and destroys your original operating system…in this case, your natural immune system.
The good news is we’ll know by winter if this is good science.
The bad news is the Faucists will have started injecting it into small children before then.
I see the keyword cowards have been spamming the keywords again.
Ping.
That’s my understanding too. If that turns out to be the case... man oh man.
The provaxxers virtually NEVER provide anything beyond their snarky opinion.
They do not provide any evidence that they are correct. They just tell everyone else they are wrong and expect us to believe it because they said so.
I expect a much more convincing case than their snarky, arrogant opinion that they are right because they are better than everyone else.
And any parent who allows their child to be used as a guinea pig by big pharma so they can line their pockets are child abusers.
Those poor kids do NOT deserve what they are facing.
Actually it doesn't. It wants you to think that but nowhere makes that argument.
Why? Because there's absolutely zero evidence to date that the vaccines make you more susceptible to any infectious disease. It's just pure speculation pulled out of the author's butt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.