Posted on 10/04/2021 5:42:34 PM PDT by janetjanet998
Pfizer Scientists: ‘Your [COVID] Antibodies Are Better Than The [Pfizer] Vaccination.' #ExposePfizer
Did they actually say this, or is it just someone’s interpretation that backs their own agenda? Sadly, I trust neither side of the COVID discussion.
An argument to develop a traditional attenuated virus Vaccine for Sars CoV2.
Yes they actually said it and a lot more. Watch the vid it’s shocking
Well, I hardly needed anybody from Pfizer to tell me that that’s true.
You can’t get antibodies of any sort until and unless you get infected or get vaccinated which triggers an immune response. Also the point of a vaccine is to prevent infection to begin with or at least reduce severity of the infection. An initial infection can’t do that because, well, obviously, you get infected and have zero immunity before that. So if the antibodies from a full infection are “better”, which is likely true, it is quite irrelevant, unless you have an agenda / false narrative to propagate, of course.
There is some question about whether bodies retain long-term knowledge about viruses (T-cells?). Some people, who previously had been exposed to a SARS virus and doesn’t “test positive” for COVID may indeed be able to fight off the virus or have reduced symptoms. To believe we’ve magically solved SARS is false.
The Fauci/China biological warfare virus it 99.98% survivable for people under the age of 50 without doctors or drugs, you pathetic Branch Covidian medical fascist.
You sure your response went to the right person? The person I responded to stated that you can’t have any immunity to COVID unless you get infected (assuming you aren’t vaccinated). I’m stating that you might be able to fight off COVID without ever getting sick or testing positive for it. Not sure how that makes me a “Branch Covidian medical fascist”.
They actually mention you in the video.
You’re right. Responded to wrong post. Sorry.
Dumb Question:
Why wouldn’t your Natural Immunity from infection and recovery be far superior to a vaccine aimed at only 1 small portion of said virus??
Not exactly.
I had Covid in January. Confirmed case, classic loss of smell and other symptoms, confirmed antibodies.
I am not going to get the vaccine, as it is medically not needed and potentially dangerous.
So I will be fired on November 22.
Welcome to the club.
I refuse to get this. Actually, I’d refuse even if I never had COVID and my MIL hadn’t died from it.
The stats on the disease are far too minor to risk an unknown, not fully researched bunch of vaxes. Not worth it.
What a load...propaganda much?
“Why wouldn’t your Natural Immunity from infection and recovery be far superior to a vaccine aimed at only 1 small portion of said virus??”
NOT a dumb question at all, but in fact the crux of the matter, namely the mRNA genetic injections trigger a single antibody, namely the antibody to the covid S (spike) protein, whereas natural infection will produce antibodies to most and perhaps ALL of the proteins of the covid virus, thus in the case of natural immunity; thus should one encounter a mutated version of the virus that one has immunity to, the chances are very good that several of the antibodies from the natural infection are still functional, whereas if one encounters a covid virus with a mutated S protein, the chances are very good that the S protein antibody from the mRNA vaccine is useless against the covid virus with a mutated S protein spike ...
damn... are they all queer?
Exactly what I came here to post. Glad I’m not the only one who noticed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.