Level 1. The Direct Answer.
Level 2 . Your question is an example of the Argument of Irreducible Complexity . Puzzles like your example do not prove Evolution is not true. It only shows someone was not clever enough to figure out how Evolution did it.
Level 3. Arguments for and against Evolution use to be all the rage here at Free Republic. The posts would go on and on while convincing nobody to change their mind. You can’t reason somebody out of something they were not reasoned into.
Level 4. Evolution is as much a part of my own personal Religion as Jesus is to Christians. Unlike Christianity I don’t have any requirement to recruit anybody. If you are curious as to what my Religion entails you can check it out right here.
Likewise, stories about how things POSSIBLY could have evolved do not prove Evolution IS true.
Biologists today state that cheetahs are likely to become extinct due to lack of DNA diversity; yet Evolutionists say that the animals (and plants) we see today were created evolved by individual small changes accumulated over vast amounts of time.
Yet a person CAN be 'reasoned' into something that is not true.
Have you ever met any Mormons who were NOT born into it?
'It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.'
--Mark Twain
I would change the word 'convince' to 'admit'.
Likewise;
...arguments against Creationism only shows someone was not given enough faith to believe GOD did it.
The GOD that I serve is unreasonable. He is beholden to no knowledge that sets itself up in opposition to Himself.
HE demands nothing short of perfection in His worshippers.
If Mankind doesn't do it His way; well, they've been warned.