Attorney Robert Barnes says the FDA approval is not what the public thinks. This is because once the FDA approves a vaccine it has to by law revoke all the Emergency Use Authorizations (aka EUAs) of all the other vaccines. They did not reverse and revoke Pfizer’s EUA, Moderna’s EUA and Johnson & Johnson EUA.
Under Federal Law EUAs cannot be issued if there is already an FDA approved drug on the market. The way Big Pharma got around that with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc.. is to say they are only looking at other “vaccines”. Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are not considered vaccines. That the game they have been playing.
Plus under EUA there is no liability. Pfizer actually does not want FDA approval because then they are liable. What they approved is not even on the market.
See more below.
https://banned.video/watch?id=612801e527d8fc6ed4dc2e07
Thank you. Karen Kingston brought up some of these points in her video interview, too. House of Vax, vax_truck, Ava Braun... disagree because, um, they say so.
Hey FR, are we allowed to be retired in our own home and unvaccinated? There must be a law against that.
It’s these types of exemptions that causes people not to trust anything they are hearing about this ‘pandemic’.
If there is really a pandemic, their actions tell me they are not too serious about dealing with it - just getting chemicals into the arms of a segment of the population.
“Attorney Robert Barnes”
An attorney? You mean like Bill and Hillary?