Skip to comments.
In Tense Hearing, Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Convinces Judge to Throw Out Significant Portions of the Goverment’s Case (FBI Surveillance)
Law and Crime via MSN ^
| 09 17 2021
| Colin Kalmbacher
Posted on 09/17/2021 7:46:00 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
FBI had a fixed-wing aircraft hovering above Kenosha. They allegedly have infra-red footage of Kyle Rittenhouse initiating the confrontation with Joseph Rosenbaum.
It looks like the FBI suspected there might be trouble and was ready to record the events.
To: yesthatjallen; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; ...
RKBA Ping List
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
2
posted on
09/17/2021 7:48:22 PM PDT
by
PROCON
(Our rights do not come from government, therefore they cannot take them away.)
To: yesthatjallen
Significant Portions
Wow, all the judge said was the couldn't try to him to Proud Boys simply by association. Their case must be very weak.
3
posted on
09/17/2021 7:51:00 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: yesthatjallen
I’d think it would be very difficult to make a clear determination from infrared footage.
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
It will be interesting to see how good the footage they release is,
It would be interesting to see how many other cases in how many other cities they have used this footage in, as I expect the answer is none.
If the answer is none, why is that ?
5
posted on
09/17/2021 7:57:57 PM PDT
by
algore
( )
To: algore
by this, I meant drone footage, cause you know they have it/
6
posted on
09/17/2021 7:58:28 PM PDT
by
algore
( )
To: yesthatjallen
Withholding evidence from the defense is not a good thing
Hope this is an honest judge
7
posted on
09/17/2021 8:00:30 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
Overhead infra red footage versus cell phone photography from yards away.
Yep, weak case.
8
posted on
09/17/2021 8:04:25 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: yesthatjallen
I think every decision by the judge is sound.
9
posted on
09/17/2021 8:04:59 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
To: yesthatjallen
Or they just took IR imagery from Afghanistan or somewhere and told the judge it was whomever. How do you ID people using IR? All you can see is a heat signature!
10
posted on
09/17/2021 8:08:37 PM PDT
by
gr8eman
(When you're bought and paid for by commies...you're a commie!)
To: yesthatjallen
The defense said they hadn’t seen that evidence before. I don't think that prosecutors can withhold evidence like this from the defense, at least in a US court.
Move the trial to anywhere in China and the prosecutors don't even need evidence, just a word from the CCP.
11
posted on
09/17/2021 8:10:57 PM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: yesthatjallen
Bullcrap. That is the FBI **characterization** of the event. Rittenhouse stopped him from pushing that flaming dumpster into the gas station and put it out with a fire extinguisher. In the twisted minds of the FBI traitors, that is Rittenhouse “initiating” a confrontation.
12
posted on
09/17/2021 8:12:20 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
To: yesthatjallen
The FBI withholding evidence… again.
13
posted on
09/17/2021 8:12:31 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
To: yesthatjallen
Defense counsel for Rittenhouse said they were unaware of the FBI aerial surveillance video...isn’t the prosecution required to turn over all the evidence collected?
I wonder what else are holding on to?
14
posted on
09/17/2021 8:13:27 PM PDT
by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: Nifster
I thought by law the prosecution had to give all evidence to the defense.
15
posted on
09/17/2021 8:14:41 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Leftists are The Droplet of Sewage in a gallon of ultra-pure clean water.)
To: algore
This would be the same government that used drone surveillance in Afghanistan to murder 10 civilians, 7 of them children.
16
posted on
09/17/2021 8:17:15 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
To: yesthatjallen
Kenosha went up in flames.
Was one arsonist arrested?
And what right did the FBI have to be doing this?
And, note the language? “Convinces judge”. Not judge rules or judge decides. No it must be some sort of manipulation of the judge.
And, I doubt there is any evidence that shows what this article claims without any evidence.
17
posted on
09/17/2021 8:18:26 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: yesthatjallen
18
posted on
09/17/2021 8:18:42 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: rlmorel
"I thought by law the prosecution had to give all evidence to the defense."
Ahhh, I remember those days! Good times.
19
posted on
09/17/2021 8:21:49 PM PDT
by
Dogbert41
("Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled" (Matthew 5:6).)
To: rlmorel
“I thought by law the prosecution had to give all evidence to the defense.”
Exactly what is happening.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson