Grotesque conflicts of interest on NIH ivermectin non-recommendation

The National Institutes of Health provided a non-recommendation for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19, stating that there was:

“insufficient evidence … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.”

The process for reaching that non-recommendation, however, is opaque. The Panel members responsible for therapy recommendations are disclosed and also that:

“… working groups propose updates to the Guidelines based on the latest published research findings and evolving clinical information.”

However, NIH has gone to extreme efforts to avoid stating whether a vote was held to endorse the ivermectin non-recommendation. This includes fighting a Freedom of Information Act request in federal court. A deceptive non-vote would constitute an atrocity. NIH has also been secretive about the composition of the working group that proposed the ivermectin non-recommendation. The names of those individuals were redacted by the NIH from a document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request for the agenda of a meeting considering ivermectin.

However, the group responsible for the ivermectin non-recommendation has been discovered through a FOIA request to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The FOIA response shows that the working group has nine members. Three members of the working group, Adaora Adimora, Roger Bedimo, and David V. Glidden, have disclosed a financial relationship with Merck. Merck has campaigned against the use of ivermectin in COVID-19. A fourth member, Susanna Naggie, had an extraordinary potential conflict of interest. She received a $155 million grant for the study of ivermectin following the non-recommendation. Funding for the study would have been difficult to justify if the drug was recommended for use in COVID-19. It is not known, however, if the panelist was aware of that opportunity or was planning to apply for that grant at the time of the deliberations on ivermectin.

The deception and secrecy surrounding the NIH ivermectin non-recommendation should have raised serious doubts about its integrity. The grotesque conflicts of interest of Panel members should make it clear that the NIH, as the FDA with its slandering of ivermectin as a “horse dewormer,” should not be taken seriously.

The Vax does not work.

Everybody will be infected sooner or later. We need to treat this Covid disease the same way malaria is treated.

Roll out the Ivermectin Therapy!

If you cannot get a physician’s prescription, you can order it here:

1) Zivirdo Kit:

https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=Zivirdo&prdsrc=1&countryiso=USA

2) Ivermectin Tabs ( get 12 mg tabs)

https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=ivermection+12+mg&prdsrc=1&src=as-popular%3Akwd%3Divermect12%3Apos%3D1%3Acat%3D-2%3Amcat%3D-2&qu-cx=1&countryiso=USA

***************************

Protocols to follow for both Prophylaxis and Therapy for Infection:( read it in detail before ordering)

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf

Ivermectin is no longer a banned treatment by the CDC. They are just “not recommending” it.The reason that the government is so afraid of Ivermectin is that it likely clears the circulation system of ALL stick proteins whether generated by the VAX or by the Virus. So it will likely reverse the effect of the jab.

You will need over the counter Zinc, Vitamin D and Quercetin supplements.Available on line or at larger drug stores.

Hundreds of Feepers stocked up over the last 6 months.

********************************

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343390023_Ivermectin_docks_to_the_SARS-CoV-2_spike_receptor-binding_domain_attached_to_A

There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.

Abstract:

Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08. Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.

The following video explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.

Note: Ivermectin therapy likley will gradually rid the body of spike proteins altogether, something to remember for those who might have residual side effects from mRNA vaccine.

Excellent info. See my post #3 for available ivermectin. Frontline Doctors ripped me off. Maybe not intentionally, they are severely backlogged. When a frontline dr finally called me (we had already been cured using some livestock 1% injectable I had on hand for the dogs) it was to tell me she couldn’t prescribe it because it was in short supply.

The livestock ivermectin is exactly the same drug, and cures the coof very, very quickly. I’ve seen it work on very sick people 3 times now.

What’s amazing to me, is all these years I was taking NyQuil, Sudafed, theraflu, etc, I had the cure for the common cold/flu in the fridge the whole time. Think of the $$$ in just the common cold drugstore meds that will disappear if the unwashed deplorable masses figure this out.

I used to argue with “conspiracy minded” friends who claimed they may have the cures for some cancers but the treatments are too profitable so they hide the cures. Well I no longer make that argument. If they can hide the cure for the common cold that long to avoid losing profit on otc cold meds, well..you see where I’m coming from? These people are sick.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.