Tracy Beanz: There Have Been 26 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Studies Proving the Effectiveness of Ivermectin

Freedom First Network ^ | Show September 13, 2021 | The Jeff Dornik

[pepsi_junkie]

The pharmacies, around here, are now asking if an Ivermectin prescription is for treatment.

They should just tell the pharmicist that they intend to give the pills to kids to get high and maybe OD. Apparently pharmacists have ZERO issue filing a script for that purpose.

[zeestephen]

Actually, CDC has estimated total infections at 100 million.

The 40 million number is confirmed cases, although the PCR test has some obvious problems.

Recently, a mathematical model (from the Cleveland Clinic as I recall) estimated 120 million total USA infections.

[Jane Long]

Great reply!!

Will pass this on. Thx.

[NobleFree]

“She is an excellent reporter.”

Which doesn’t make her a reliable interpreter of pharmaceutical studies.

[NobleFree]

“how come there’s no list of links to these studies?”

I can think of at least two possible reasons: they may not exist, or they may not say what they’re claimed to say.

[Texas Fossil]

I’ve known her for a number of years. Was going to check to see how many, but Twitter has suspended her account. Can no longer read it.

She is a good reporter, she is on https://uncoverdc.com/

The MSM reporting about Covid19 is nothing but lies from the “experts”.

This is not about public health, it is about the agenda.

There is no other explanation for them to continue to feed us nothing but lies. And to censor so many people, including well known doctors.

[Texas Fossil]

Not what she described but not to be blown off.

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
Covid Analysis, Sep 14, 2021, Version 118
https://ivmmeta.com/#intro

Results

Figure 3, 4, and 5 show results by treatment stage. Figure 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 show forest plots for a random effects meta-analysis of all studies with pooled effects, and for studies reporting mortality results, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, hospitalization, recovery, COVID-19 cases, and viral clearance results only. Figure 14 shows results for peer reviewed trials only and Figure 15 shows results restricted to serious outcomes. Table 1 summarizes the results.

Treatment time	Number of studies reporting positive effects	Total number of studies	Percentage of studies reporting positive effects	Probability of an equal or greater percentage of positive results from an ineffective treatment	Random effects meta-analysis results
Early treatment	24	27	88.9%	1 in 41 thousand	69% improvement RR 0.31 [0.21‑0.46] p < 0.0001
Late treatment	20	22	90.9%	1 in 17 thousand	40% improvement RR 0.60 [0.48‑0.76] p < 0.0001
Prophylaxis	14	14	100%	1 in 16 thousand	86% improvement RR 0.14 [0.08‑0.25] p < 0.0001
All studies	58	63	92.1%	1 in 1 trillion	67% improvement RR 0.33 [0.26‑0.41] p < 0.0001

Table 1. Results by treatment stage.