Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Courts Will Rule Against Biden on Vaccine Mandate Penalties: Professor Alan Dershowitz
Epoch Times ^ | 09/12/2021 | Jack Phillips

Posted on 09/12/2021 8:54:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2021 8:54:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Courts will likely agree that the federal government has the authority to enforce COVID-19 vaccine mandates> but will argue that the rules and penalties cannot be enforced, said Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz.

Classic doublespeak!

How do you "enforce" without "enforcing rules" and penalties?

2 posted on 09/12/2021 9:00:25 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But science doesn’t support Jab mandates. The real science is being suppressed by the Tech giants.


3 posted on 09/12/2021 9:00:27 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dershowitz admits that it is not an emergency but also says that the government can force a mandate. Does that mean that all people most get the HPV, the shingles shot, the regular flue shot, etc?


4 posted on 09/12/2021 9:01:21 PM PDT by jrestrepo (Now I am an insurgent. Starve the beast (any way possible) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am not sure you can argue that this can be required by
Federal legislation either. Based on the case history the states and localities via legislative action have had this power. I not sure you can make a case to the Courts that a 2% death rate and 5% hospitalization rate warrants the Feds up surging the State’s powers


5 posted on 09/12/2021 9:02:02 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

I think Dershowitz said that Congress is the body that sets the fines and penalties and the Executive enforces it. Executive can’t be both “judge (setting fines and penalties) and executioner.”

We’ll see.


6 posted on 09/12/2021 9:07:09 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So what’s to stop 100+ employee companies from forming two or three (or ten) employee leasing companies and paying the smaller companies for the employees?


7 posted on 09/12/2021 9:09:04 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
It isn't double-speak. He said that courts would find that the federal government as a whole has the power to order this, but that the President can't do it without Congress. So, these particular fines and penalties are invalid.

So yes, the federal government can do this theoretically, but not in the way Biden actually did it.

8 posted on 09/12/2021 9:09:27 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrestrepo

Dershowitz is not to be trusted on this, imo.

He speaks with forked tongue.

He is Deep State/Great Reset to the core.


9 posted on 09/12/2021 9:09:30 PM PDT by laplata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: lightman

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to mandate has no authority to mandate vaccines.


11 posted on 09/12/2021 9:20:30 PM PDT by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free Republicans

Obamacare was a Legislative act, not an Executive Order

Apples to oranges comparison.


12 posted on 09/12/2021 9:21:01 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

That’s what I was thinking. But many companies are fine with the mandate.


13 posted on 09/12/2021 9:35:10 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Well, considerate of them to publicly announce themselves as kapos and unworthy of your work.


14 posted on 09/12/2021 9:36:55 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Judges have personal lives. And they have families who have personal lives.

Have long suspected that FDR’s goons blackmailed, extorted, or intimidated the individual members of SCOTUS into reversing their position on FDR’s “New Deal” power grab; a grotesque overreach of government which they had previously, and correctly, found to be unconstitutional.


15 posted on 09/12/2021 9:47:15 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m starting to hear distance sounds of gunfire!


16 posted on 09/12/2021 9:49:30 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is applied Marxism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

So what’s to stop 100+ employee companies from forming two or three (or ten) employee leasing companies and paying the smaller companies for the employees?>>> That is what i would do first up. and see how the feds try to manage the mess. Then you can paper terrorize them if the require paperwork filing etc.


17 posted on 09/12/2021 9:51:40 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Perhaps, but it wont stop businesses, states, etc. from mandating such.


18 posted on 09/12/2021 9:55:48 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrestrepo

Excellent point. We have been living with Covid since Feb 2020 ish and restriction free since May 2021 almost every state. You can’t all of a sudden decide the new spike is a emergency.

He’s just trying to cover/distract from Afghanistan.


19 posted on 09/12/2021 10:00:55 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, eventually... hopefully... if the courts still believe the things the founders instructed them to believe and the law showed what was to be believed from that point.

Of course they will, after a lengthy deliberation and an appropriate venue where claimants who can describe “harm” will be seen.

The biggest difference from twenty years ago is that the president doesn’t give no F***s about the law, he’s going to get the results wherever he can.


20 posted on 09/12/2021 10:17:07 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson