d:^)
https://nationalfile.com/liz-cheney-wins-again-trump-coaxed-into-endorsing-cheneys-bff-former-political-advisor-tied-to-effort-to-steal-his-2016-nomination/
Posted on 09/09/2021 9:32:20 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) responded to former President Trump’s endorsement of her House challenger on Thursday, writing on Twitter “Bring it.”
Trump on Thursday officially endorsed Wyoming attorney Harriet Hageman as she wages a bid to unseat Cheney from her post in Congress.
Trump, in his endorsement, called Cheney the Democrats’ “number one provider of sound bites.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
With a mail-in ballot?
One is Democrat and the other is a traitor in our fox hole and that makes the latter 10 times worse than the former.
It’s Wyoming. She needs to be worried about the voters at-large. Trump won 70%.
d:^)
https://nationalfile.com/liz-cheney-wins-again-trump-coaxed-into-endorsing-cheneys-bff-former-political-advisor-tied-to-effort-to-steal-his-2016-nomination/
Strange. I don’t know what to think.
Confident that she will have “dominion” over her opponent
Confident that she will have “dominion” over her opponent
I get a little nervous when Trump makes an endorsement. One thing he’s not known for is his ability to select talent…
If this xunt wins a a small plurality (the only way she could win) there will be a conservative third party candidate who would be viable in a 3-way race, so HEEEEELLLLLLLLL NO should anyone vote for a stinking rat.
Anyway, good news that Trump has made an endorsement, though some people don’t seem to like the choice.
She'll stand with Biden in his unconstitutional phone-and-pen power grab. If that doesn't finish her, well, anyway...
I never bought the idea that Trump making an endorsement in this crowded race would ensure one candidate becomes the clear frontrunner against Princess Liz. Trump has made numerous bad primary picks in the past. If he choose a weak candidate (in campaign skills or funding) or RINOish one, his endorsement would further divide conservatives, and do more harm than good.
A Trump endorsement might have been more useful if one candidate emerged stronger than the rest, but the remaining anti-Liz candidates refused to budge, and THEN Trump endorsed the ALREADY clear cut "best" Cheney challenger.
It is strange because this seems like it might be an exercise of replacing one RINO with another.
Interesting Trump says Senator Lummis supports Hageman, Lummis came out and said good choice but she isn’t endorsing yet.
If she hasn’t denounced Liz yet she better.
Bunt cake.
I don’t know whether Trump’s endorsement was a good one or a bad one. The one thing that I know is that, to ensure that Cheney is defeated, we should do everything possible to encourage all but one Republican challenger to drop out, given that WY does not have a runoff requirement in primaries in which the winner gets below 50% (or even 30%). Unless Trump changes his mind in the next few months, Trump’s endorsement of Hageman makes her the candidate best suited to fundraise and the hardest one to convince to drop out, so, barring an unforeseen event, she’s the one to support. (Please note that I’m not saying this because I trust Trump’s instincts when endorsing candidates—his track record has been a mixed bag—but because of the realities of election laws in Wyoming.)
Two down, five to go:
“WYOMING. USAF vet Bryan Miller (R) & atty Darin Smith (R) end their runs vs Cong Liz Cheney after Donald Trump endorses Harriet Hageman in the race. St Sen Anthony Bouchard, St Rep Chuck Gray, ret Army Col Denton Knapp, 2 others, are staying in the GOP primary race.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.