Is the Left Losing Its Grip on California?

Townhall.com ^ | September 8, 2021 | Star Parker

[Wayne07]

You are being sadly dishonest, and a poor loser. You mom would not be proud. I don't care whether Latinos are separated are not. Who cares. But the number you quoted was non-Latino white.

It would be obvious that “Whites” does not include Latino Whites?

It would be obvious that whoever put the voter numbers together didn't include Latino voters in the 49%, otherwise the number would be a lot higher, like 80%. Math is hard for retards, amirght?

[SmokingJoe]

Um, leave my mother out of this will you?
I am willing to bet my mother was far more proud of me than yours ever was of you.

Who cares. But the number you quoted was non-Latino white.

Says who?
You?
A deranged paid far left lunatic?
Don't make me laugh.
The figure quoted was for Whites, irrespective of what country they originally came from or what language they originally spoke..

, whoever put the voter numbers together didn't include Latino voters in the 49%, otherwise the number would be a lot higher, like 80%. Math is hard for retards, amirght?

HAHAHA! A figure coming from a conservativesite like Townhall is obviously for all Whites.
Answer me this just what percentage of the American population is White (including Latino Whites)?

[Wayne07]

HAHAHA! A figure coming from a conservativesite like Townhall is obviously for all Whites.

If 49% is for all whites, what do you suspect the composition is for the other 51%? As you try to figure that out you just might realize how dumb you are.

Moot point since I already showed you the numbers, but maybe working it out will help you understand.

[SmokingJoe]

If 49% is for all whites, what do you suspect the composition is for the other 51%?

Been through all that in post #79.

[Wayne07]

That's when you, shockingly, said the 51% could include "non-white latinos", but you are also saying the 49% included includes latinos: "Its ALL Whites. German Whites, Scandinavian Whites, French Whites, Belgian Whites, Latino Whites...ALL Whites."

So get your freaking head on straight, latinos can't both be in the 49% and 51%.

[SmokingJoe]

That's when you, shockingly, said the 51% could include “non-white latinos”,

Perhaps you will be good enough to show me exactly where I said that...WITH QUOTES.
Not only are you a far left lunatic, you lie and make sh*t up without batting an eyelid. Just like almost all left wing crazies do.

but you are also saying the 49% included includes Latino's: “Its ALL Whites. German Whites, Scandinavian Whites, French Whites, Belgian Whites, Latino Whites...ALL Whites.”

CORRECT! And that is fact.

[Wayne07]

Perhaps you will be good enough to show me exactly where I said that...

OK? Scroll up two inches and witness your own stupidity..

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3992970/posts?page=79#79

CORRECT! And that is fact.

No, and not sure why we need to go over it again. The total, all inclusive, SmokingCrackJoe definition of white, all whites including latinos, vote for "whites" was 70%. The non-latino White vote was 49%.

Serious question, do you know you are dumb, or are you too dumb to know how dumb you are?

[DoodleDawg]

...the polls are within the margin of error showing Newsom holding on in the recall.

The polls this month have Newsom surviving by a low of 8 points and a high of 17. Way outside the margin of error.

[SmokingJoe]

So I'll type this very slowly, so even a mentally challenged leftwing nut-job like you, who doesn't understand English can understand.
From my post # 79:

"If 49% was all white voters, what do you think the other 51% is?

Oh lemme see..Blacks, Asians, Non White Latinos etc etc. Plenty of races in California."

The "..Blacks, Asians, Non White Latinos etc etc. “ very clearly refers to the 51% who are Non White.
It does NOT refer to the 49% of voters who were White.
What language do you speak anyway?

[Wayne07]

This is a multiple choice problem, and there is no choice (outside of your own head) for non-white latinos. There is only non-Latino White, Latino, and the combines “all white”. The 49%, as I’ve shown you the source, is non-Latino white. Everything else only exists in your tiny dank brain.

[SmokingJoe]

Nice way for you to totally avoid any of the points in my taking you apart in my post #89. Chuckle.
Once again, we have Latinos, White Latinos and non White Latinos. The 49% of voters who were White in the 2020 elections in California were made up of Whites of all backgrounds, including White Latinos

[Wayne07]

The 49% of voters who were White in the 2020 elections in California were made up of Whites of all backgrounds, including White Latinos

For the 10th(?) time, no. Wrong. The 49% is exclusive of Latinos. Latinos were categorized separately and made up 31% of the vote.

BTW, the only idiots who use the term white latino are you, and the NY Times referring to George Zimmerman when they wanted to blame a white person for killing Trayvon Martin.

[SmokingJoe]

For the 10th(?) time, no. Wrong.

For the nth time YES. White Latinos are Whites as well as Latinos. That is why they are counted on both groups. That is why census percentage figures by race always add up to much higher than 100%.

The 49% is exclusive of Latinos.

NOPE. The 49% is ALL Whites including Latinos. Go look at the census forms that we fill.

Latinos were categorized separately and made up 31% of the vote

Latinos are made up of different races including Blacks and Whites. You can be Black and Latino. You can be White and Latino.