Hey look Religion of Peace, I learned to eat using my left hand!
Posted on 08/25/2021 9:26:23 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Germany is working “intensively” to evacuate Afghan staff ahead of a looming deadline, Chancellor Angela Merkel told lawmakers in the Bundestag on Wednesday.
Merkel’s remarks came after US President Joe Biden ruled out extending the deadline for evacuations beyond August 31.
German military aircraft have so far rescued over 4,600 people including German citizens and local support workers, according to the German Defense Ministry.
Merkel said that Germany would still try to help Afghans who worked with its soldiers and aid organizations and wish to leave Afghanistan even after the deadline.
“The end of the air bridge in a few days must not mean the end of efforts to protect Afghan helpers and help those Afghans who have been left in a bigger emergency with the takeover of the Taliban,” she said. […]
Merkel said that the fact that the Taliban are back in power is “bitter, but we have to deal with it.” …
(Excerpt) Read more at dw.com ...
MIDDLE EAST: The Taliban Now Controls a U.S.-Made Super-Surveillance System
For 20 years, biometric surveillance served as a substitute for a civil society and the rule of law. Now, those tools are in the hands of the Taliban.
Albert Fox Cahn: Updated Aug. 24, 2021 7:12AM ET / Published Aug. 24, 2021 3:37AM ET
In Kabul, checkpoints are now manned by Taliban fighters using bio-metric scanners paid for by the American people to hunt down civilians who worked and fought alongside us, in what should be a reckoning for everyone who sold bio-metric surveillance as a tool for good.
Over the last 20 years, Afghanistan became a technological training ground. It was the place America experimented with new weapons of war, like the Predator drone, often with horrific results. It’s also where we experimented with new forms of surveillance, both militarized and humanitarian. By going community to community, scanning Afghans’ bio-metric data indiscriminately, the U.S. hoped to create new counter-insurgency tools.
That effort failed to create anything that could stop the Taliban, but it did create things that are incredibly dangerous in the Taliban’s own hands.
Approximately 80 percent of the country, roughly 25 million people, were targeted for inclusion in the U.S. military’s biometric database. Now, the Handheld Interagency Identity Detection Equipment can scan Afghans’ fingerprints, faces, and irises to reveal biographical information. The Microsoft-powered device can also tap into a much larger national database of information on millions of Afghans collected by the United States over two decades of war.
With that technology, the Taliban will take control of one of the most sophisticated state surveillance systems on the planet.
It gets worse. While few expected the U.S. military to focus on promoting Afghans’ civil rights, many expected better from the United Nations, particularly the UN Refugee Agency. Instead, the UNHCR drove a nearly two-decade long campaign to require bio-metric data to receive aid, creating yet another dangerous database for the Taliban to control.
Since 2002, Afghanistan served as a de facto testing ground for new bio-metric technology, including one of the earliest iris scanning systems in the world. For aid agencies, this was a way to not only confirm the identities of employees, but to track who received food and other staples, blocking recipients from receiving too much food under multiple names. Privacy and civil rights complaints were dismissed as alarmist—as they so often are—but now Afghans will pay the price.
As in countless other low-income countries, bio-metric surveillance became a substitute for civil society and the rule of law. Yes, fraud and embezzlement are real problems. Yes, we must ensure that aid gets to those most in need. But when we respond to humanitarian crises with dystopian tools like facial recognition and iris scans, we’re undermining the very democratic principles we were supposedly fighting to support.
Every time bio-metric surveillance became more embedded in Afghan society, the risks for abuse grew, but the pushback was ignored. When facial recognition became the entry fee for casting a ballot, those on the ground and their supporters around the world pushed back, only to once again be ignored.
Today, the elaborate network of bio-metric surveillance that was largely bought and paid for with American taxpayer dollars is now one of the Taliban’s most terrifying tools. Aid workers, interpreters, and other American allies can get forged papers, they can wipe their phones, but they can’t change their faces. And for those risking their lives to get to the Kabul airport and the last fleeting hope of safety, every Taliban checkpoint brings the risk of a facial scan, and deadly repercussions.
Most countries don’t face the same risk of collapse that the Afghan government did, but the lessons still apply. Whenever we let any company or government capture our bio-metric data, we give them the one form of information that will haunt us for life. You can change your name but not your iris or DNA.
Even if we trust our own government with such tracking tools (and we should not), what about everyone else who can take the data? Nearly 200,000 Americans’ faces were taken in just one Department of Homeland Security hack in 2019, but that’s infinitesimal compared to the millions of federal employees whose data was stolen in the 2015 Office of Personnel Management hack.
It doesn’t take a governmental collapse to see our bio-metric data transformed from a tool used by police into one used by criminals and militants. And so far, there is only one surefire way to protect our bio-metric data and prevent it from being repurposed: not collecting it in the first place.
In Kabul, checkpoints are now manned by Taliban fighters using bio-metric scanners paid for by the American people to hunt down civilians who worked and fought alongside us, in what should be a reckoning for everyone who sold bio-metric surveillance as a tool for good.
That effort failed to create anything that could stop the Taliban, but it did create things that are incredibly dangerous in the Taliban’s own hands.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-taliban-now-controls-a-us-made-super-surveillance-system
You’re a westerner (or ally). You’re in Kabul. Time is running out. What are you gonna do?
I think it’s about to get pretty frantic.
Less than 72 hours to be exact.
Merkel got her German citizens out... so she doesn't have to have her military brass stand up and try to gaslight a corrupt press into thinking 17 planeloads of 'people' meant German citizens...
Makes sense. You must get our forces out. The last few flights will be the most dangerous as the Taliban remains the only force protection at the airport. Thousands of Afghans at the perimeter of the airport may storm the barricades trying to get on the last flights out. Could be massive chaos.
You mean its not already?
I’d pull out the hiking boots and just head north (avoiding roads). You’d hit Tajikistan in 12 days.
Not compared to what the last days could portend. Desperate people do desperate things.
Yep. Wondering when we here at home get desperate enough what will happen.
We should not only extend the deadline to “whenever we feel like it” but should aggressively pursue and cut down any Taliban who disagree.
With a sufficient force to get the job done this time.
“by August 31st” - does that mean at midnight August 31st??? - or does it mean before August 31st, midnight August 30th. Taliban are by nature a deceitful, dishonest bunch of terrorists. What if they mean the latter, not the former, and anyone and anything remaining at the airport after midnight August 30th is in peril!!
and what if the Taliban response is to grab a dozen left behind Americans, line them up at the airport gate and behead them with camera rolling for all the world to see..
Honestly, that is the sort of thing I was thinking too. Travel at night.
Just watch the end of “The Sound of Music” to get a feel for what’s going on.
Woudd need to carry to weeks of food and water. Hmmmm...
Forget them, Jim...
They are either dead, soon-to-be-decapitated, or sex slaves now...
They are going to do that anyway
Would you prefer we cower in fear in the hopes that they don’t?
“Would you prefer we cower in fear in the hopes that they don’t?’
Of course not. But you can bet your bottom dollar the White House and Pentagon have not taken aggressive action because of that probability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.