Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legal Doc for vaccine refuser
Twitter ^ | 08.24.21 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 08/23/2021 9:11:17 PM PDT by true believer forever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: The Pack Knight

Re: 39 - Agreed 100%. The sample letter is too long and is patronizing in some sections. I can’t think of a better way to get the attention of HR and not in a good way.

People’s deeply held religious beliefs need to come from that person and not from this letter. This letter will not yield the hoped for results, I’m afraid.


41 posted on 08/24/2021 5:02:07 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

bkmrk


42 posted on 08/24/2021 5:13:03 AM PDT by Max_850
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

It’s pretty expensive though ($159.00). I’m doing the drive up testing at a LapCorp facility on Saturday for $10.00.


43 posted on 08/24/2021 5:37:22 AM PDT by Mathews (It's all gravy, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

BTTT


44 posted on 08/24/2021 5:37:34 AM PDT by Mathews (It's all gravy, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
I think you’re much better off with a brief claim of a religious (or possibly medical) exemption than to send this letter. This letter would probably be Exhibit A in the hearing to deny your unemployment benefits because they had good cause to fire you.

The purpose of the letter is to avoid the unemployment hearing -- the strength and length of it is to deter the bosses flat out first hand ... a sorta make them pee their pants move.

45 posted on 08/24/2021 5:56:46 AM PDT by true believer forever (Fight the Attacks against Trump: PLANT YOUR FEET, LEAN INTO IT, BEAT IT BACK. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Another resource; https://drleemerritt.com/uploads/Fighting%20your%20mandate4.pdf

Includes a questionnaire for your employer to fill out. Might help them think critically.


46 posted on 08/24/2021 7:55:51 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Thanks.
BFL


47 posted on 08/24/2021 8:31:56 AM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

LapCorp facility has a test approved by the FDA that shows you have antibodies?


48 posted on 08/24/2021 9:03:03 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ibi Libertas in Veritate

Welcome to Free Republic.


49 posted on 08/24/2021 9:03:40 AM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn; Big Red Badger

T-detect. Com.
.
Need to Push BACK!


50 posted on 08/24/2021 10:17:46 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (Make His Paths Straight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
The purpose of the letter is to avoid the unemployment hearing -- the strength and length of it is to deter the bosses flat out first hand ... a sorta make them pee their pants move.

I don't think this letter is going to impress anyone's employer, and will probably lead to the employee's termination. The letter is filled with street-lawyer nonsense. In particular, most of the second paragraph (discussing the ADA), and all of the third and fourth paragraphs are wrong. An employer may ask questions and request documentation to determine whether an employee has a "disability" or to determine whether that disability necessitates an accommodation under the ADA. The FMLA does not prohibit an employer from requesting medical documentation, and in fact explicitly allows an employer to require certification from a health care provider before granting medical leave. HIPAA does not apply to employers. Requesting proof of vaccination does not meet the elements of any of the four forms of the invasion of privacy tort, nor does it meet the elements of battery. Requiring an employee to be vaccinated certainly does not constitute battery.

The strongest argument would be for a religious exemption, but the rest of the letter undermines that argument by revealing that the religious exemption is probably insincere.

51 posted on 08/24/2021 10:19:08 AM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson