Not sure that it is, so maybe you should stop?
Posted on 08/22/2021 8:32:00 PM PDT by NoLibZone
study from the Francis Crick Institute in the United Kingdom has found that the Pfizer-BioNTech Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine destroys T cells and weakens the immune system. But pharmaceutical corporations are trying to suggest that the only way to prevent this from happening is for people to get third or booster doses of their vaccines.
T cells are immune cells that can focus on targeting specific foreign particles. They are most commonly studied in relation to their ability to fight cancer and infectious diseases, but they are also essential for other aspects of the body’s immune response.
There are two kinds of T cells: killer T cells and helper T cells. Killer T cells directly attack cells that have already been infected by foreign particles. Helper T cells aid other cells to develop killer cells and stimulate other cells to create neutralizing antibodies.
This study from the Francis Crick Institute focuses on the neutralizing antibodies created by T cells. It analyzes whether the Pfizer vaccine helps the T cells create enough antibodies to fight off the COVID-19 variants.
Pfizer vaccine barely produces antibodies to fight against COVID-19 The Francis Crick Institute, in collaboration with the British National Institute for Health Research, released a study that showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine produced fewer neutralizing antibodies against COVID-19’s variants. (Related: Spanish study finds Pfizer vaccine contains high levels of TOXIC graphene oxide.)
The scientists analyzed the antibodies from the blood of 250 healthy adults who have received either one or two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine up to three months after their first dose.
The researchers used a test specially developed by the Francis Crick Institute to figure out the ability of the neutralizing antibodies to prevent the entry of the COVID-19 variants.
It found that only 50 percent of the people who received a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine had a quantifiable neutralizing antibody response against the alpha variant of COVID-19. This number decreased even further to just 32 percent and 25 percent for the delta and beta variants, respectively.
The situation gets worse for older individuals who have weaker immune systems. The researchers found that older vaccine recipients generated even fewer antibodies. Coupled with the vaccine’s ability to destroy T cells and weaken the immune system even further, getting vaccinated could spell disaster for many people.
No correlation was observed for gender or body mass index. The authors of the study want to pursue further studies to check the capabilities of other vaccines, starting with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.
“So, the key message from our finding is we found that recipients of the Pfizer vaccine, those who have had two doses, have about five- to six-fold lower amounts of neutralizing antibodies,” said David Bauer, head of the Bauer Lab in the Francis Crick Institute. He continued:
“Now, these are the, sort of, gold standard, private security antibodies of your immune system which block the virus from getting into your cells in the first place. So, we’ve found that that is less for people with two doses. We also found that for people with only one dose of the Pfizer jab that they are less likely to have high levels of these antibodies in their blood.”
Instead of recommending that people stay away from the COVID-19 vaccines to protect their natural immune systems, Bauer instead said people should get booster doses of the vaccines. He also said older people should be prioritized in the distribution of booster doses.
“And perhaps most importantly for all of us going forward is that we see that the older you are, the lower your levels are likely to be. And the time since you’ve had your second jab, as that time goes on, the lower your levels are also likely to be,” he said. “So, that’s telling us that we are probably going to be needing to prioritize boosters for older and more vulnerable people.”
Learn more about the inability of the COVID-19 vaccines to prevent coronavirus infections and the push for booster doses by reading the latest articles at Vaccines.news.
Not sure that it is, so maybe you should stop?
Francis Crick, Mr. PanSpermia. Crick was a devout evolutionist until he began research into decoding human DNA. As a result of his research, he put forth a new theory that aliens had “seeded” the earth with humans.
LOL... “grudge pings”
C’mon, bff — ya’ gotta admit it’s a hilarious phrase — and you coined it!
“So, the key message from our finding is we found that recipients of the Pfizer vaccine, those who have had two doses, have about five- to six-fold lower amounts of neutralizing antibodies,” said David Bauer, head of the Bauer Lab in the Francis Crick Institute.
Does a second dose cause most people to have a lower antibody response than they had after the first dose? If so, why is the Watson & Crick Institute recommending booster shots?
They also found the Pfizer vaccine resulted in even lower antibody responses to the other COVID variants.
Are you saying The Watson & Crick Institute did not publish a study showing lowered antibody responses in 50% of those who were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine?
Thank you for linking the original study. I was trying to figure out how the article was able to say T Cells were being destroyed. There was a link to a video, but I can’t listen to that right now.
The link you provided (the Watson &Crick paper) is much more clear than the article.
The headline appears to be based on a video the author links to at the top of the article, but is never expounded upon in the article itself. It’s certainly not backed up by the Watson & Crick study.
Ha! I watched most of the Alex Jones video. He doesn’t know what he is talking about or he is just flat out lying. How anyone could take this man seriously is beyond my comprehension.
If you’re curious here’s the full paper by David Bauer that Alex Jones claims he has read:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext
Despite what Jones claims there is not any mention of killer T-cells in this paper. The paper just compares (among vaccinated people) the levels of inactivating antibodies against the original strain versus the levels of inactivating antibodies against the delta variant.
Here’s a quote summarizing the key finding of the paper:
“Two doses of BNT162b2 elicited ELISA-detected anti-Wild-type spike antibodies in all participants, and NAb activity against all strains, including the three VOCs tested, in all except six (3%) and nine (5%) of 159 participants who lacked NAb activity against B.1.617.2 and B.1.351, respectively (appendix p 2). NAbTs of sera correlated well between Wild-type and variants (appendix p 2; RS>0·82, p<2 × 10−16), as well as between VOCs (B.1.617.2 vs B.1.351: RS=0·85, p<2 × 10−16). However, NAbTs were 5·8-fold reduced against B.1.617.2 relative to Wild-type (95% CI 5·0–6·9), significantly more reduced than against B.1.1.7 (2·6-fold vs Wild-type, 95% CI 2·2–3·1), and on a similar order to the reduction observed against B.1.351 (4·9-fold vs Wild-type, 95% CI 4·2–5·7).”
Note that NAbT stands for neutralizing antibody titres.
> Thank you for linking the original study.
My pleasure. The link I provided is actually a press release from the Francis Crick institute describing the study. If you want to read the actual study by then you can find it here:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext
Thank you, again. I will read it after the sun comes up. 😀
Re: 89 - Thanks!
Unsure what Jones is talking about, frankly. As you point out, he’s claiming the study demonstrates that the Pfizer vaccine destroys T cells, when nothing in the published paper states that.
> I’m a bit confused about the study.
It is confusing because that quote is being taken out of context in order to mislead people. There is no comparison in this study between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. The comparison is being done (among only vaccinated people) of the levels of neutralizing antibodies against the various strains. The study found that vaccinated people have about 5 to 6 times less neutralizing antibodies against the delta variant as they do against the original strain.
>Does a second dose cause most people to have a lower antibody response than they had after the first dose?
No, after the second dose the level of neutralizing antibodies against all the strains is higher than after only one dose for all variants. See graph G in Figure 1 in the following link (supplementary material of Bauer’s paper):
For each of the variants of interest you see a shift to higher levels of neutralizing antibodies after the second dose.
👍🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And what about the study out of Penn showing just the opposite??
I agree with you.
The speed with which they’ve been pushed out is alarming.
We shall be hearing a lot of :
“it’s what we knew at the time”
******************************************************************************************************
I agree with y’all.
When the polio shots began, that mass vax initiative had to be suspended within a month. After investigation and determining the mistakes that were made by the lab making the vaccine(cutter lab), adjustments were made and the effort restarted. A search for Cutter Lab Incident provides some interesting details.
It’s totally irresponsible that no independent oversight committee regarding safety and ethics has been set up (which is the norm for new vaccines).
And it was known before the first jab went into an arm that this Faux Vax was not going to be effective. Why do I call it a Faux Vax?
1. DEFINITION OF VACCINE:
Definition of vaccine per US Code: (2)Vaccine
The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4132
Using the word vaccine is a very clever way to sorta MISLEAD people into thinking that it is a typical vaccine which will prevent illness. It doesn’t do that.
WORTHLESS AT PREVENTION AND INCREASES SPREAD:
This mRNA is worthless as a preventative, and in fact has made the situation worse. The injected get sick, but due to the shot, don’t know it-lack of symptoms.
So they spread it, unknowingly. And they also don’t get early treatment, so they are likely to be sicker than they would have been, as the virus has been multiplying covertly within.
Approximately 81% of the population in fact had some measure of existing immunity and further, that immunity would be strengthened, materially so, by natural infection.
It is the nucleocapsid reactivity that provides effective resistance to serious disease. The existing “vaccines” do not and cannot provide this since they encode only the spike:
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY Study January 2021:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
To get full and durable immunity, there would need to be a traditional inactivated/sterilizing vaccine derived from the virus or natural immunity from surviving the disease.
This is a computer simulated synthetic chimeric computer generated code that was uploaded by the Chinese in January to give to PHARMA to develop a shot for a pathogenic stimulant to be injected into the population of the USA.
It is in fact what is known as a “leaky” injection (term for non-sterilizing and not full immunity). Such injections are also known to aid the development of mutations - sometimes more harmful than the original.
And many doctors warned of the folly of trying to vaccinate into a pandemic-it risks more variants and more risk of more harmful mutations. There’s a reason that flu shots are given before flu season.
And just as they were ignored for that, so were Doctors ignored when they warned of serious side effects from the mRNA shots— blood clotting etc. These shots are a disaster. DJT was correct - HCQ etc. - TREATMENTS were needed.
Every healthy person under the age of fifty should have been allowed to go about life as usual, as the risk to them was small, and they would have perfected a more durable immunity than the shot.
WHAT NOW?
-These shots need to stop.
-Let the people who are fragile and their caregivers isolate
-give preventative therapeutics
-let everyone else get back to life
-have PHARMA develop a traditional sterilizing vaccine that will work better with less risk than these disastrous bio-shots.
-do not play russian roulette with kids(shots= at least 5 times the risk of the RONA). CDC/Quackster Fauci chose the wrong path. Continuing on that path is INSANE and CRIMINAL.
There was a similar thread a while back, which traced to Alex Jones. I remarked at the time, that destruction of T cells/immune system could not be concluded from that data.
However, there was a study in Nature Immunology in January 2021, which showed that the Faux Vax was going to be pretty much worthless as a preventative, because it is the nucleocapsid reactivity that provides effective resistance to serious disease. The existing “vaccines” do not and cannot provide this since they encode only the spike.
I am confused.
The director of a lab in the Francis Crick Institute says that the Pfizer vaccine reduces neutralizing antibodies in people who have been vaccinated.
Then, he says that elderly and more vulnerable people should be prioritized for COVID booster shots.
Why would he recommend boosters if they reduce your neutralizing antibodies?
If THE VIRUS DONT GET YOU WE WILL HELP IT
Thank you! Even when I watched the video of the OP I was like...no, no...that is not what he is saying at all. He was explaining that the shot wanes in effectiveness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.