Posted on 08/14/2021 9:32:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
On Friday evening, a federal district court in Texas handed the Biden Administration a huge defeat. In so doing, the court also handed the people of the United States a huge victory.
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the Northern District of Texas ruled in the case of Texas and Missouri v. Biden that the Biden Administration’s termination of the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) violated both the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), as well as federal immigration law requiring that certain illegal aliens be detained.
The MPP was one of the most successful elements of the Trump Administration’s immigration policies. Under the MPP, illegal aliens arriving at the United States border and making claims of asylum were issued a notice to appear at a future immigration court hearing and were ordered to wait in Mexico until the time of the hearing.
As Judge Kacsmaryk noted, requiring such aliens to remain in Mexico was especially important, since 86 percent of the asylum claims between FY 2008 and FY 2019 were rejected. If the illegal aliens making these bogus claims for asylum are allowed to enter the United States, many simply disappear into the fabric of country and never show up for their hearings.
In terminating MPP, the Biden Administration failed to explain why the program’s success should be ignored—especially when DHS had sung the praises of MPP before Biden took office. As Judge Kacsmaryk pointed out, “DHS … found that MPP addressed the perverse incentives” created by allowing ‘those with non-meritorious claims … [to] remain in the country for lengthy periods of time.’”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Joseph Stolen only does what the Xi Jinping tells him to do.
Bttt
As well as does not mean and. Both this and that. Both this as well as that. Which one is correct? Sophisticated journalists avoid the use of one word when they think they can get three words to do the same thing. Word count 598 I need 600 for my editor. I know! I will replace and with as well as.
yup, only republicans are held to court rulings.
IMPEACH!
You bet Judge, Jobama will get right on it.
Non. Meritorious. Claims. Ain’t that polite.
“requiring such aliens to remain in Mexico was especially important, since 86 percent of the asylum claims between FY 2008 and FY 2019 were rejected. If the illegal aliens making these bogus claims for asylum are allowed to enter the United States, many simply disappear into the fabric of country and never show up for their hearings. “
and there it is... in black and white.
The current admin is lawless and will ignore this ruling just like they do others they don't like, such as the SCOTUS ruling that CDC does not have authority to suspend contracts at a whim.
The only honest answer to this very sound ruling is:
But, Judge, we want massive numbers of illegals to enter the US and we want them to stay and become Democratic party voters.
But their lawyers will make up some more lies and nonsense, and then go judge shopping.
“Often wrong, but never in doubt!”
You should paint that in neon red letters on a black billboard and mount it on top of your house.
LOL!
I'll wait.
impeach yet?
LOL! I’m complimenting you on your FR tagline. Did you forget what you wrote?
Lots of alcohol and drugs floating around FR tonight, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.