bttt
In before the Free Republic Vaxx Shills come in with there copy-paste propaganda.
its not surprising
its what its inteded to do
along with hopefully sterilizing the women
the covid bioweapon itself that was first released, targeted male testes to sterilize them
“How convenient!”, thought Bill Gates.
This fact, that the vaccine had an adverse effect on the woman’s placenta, was known.
There is an excellent video by a woman who has, both a MD and a JD degree that points out the many wrong things about the vaccines that were rushed to production, without proper testing, that caused problems with pregnant women.
Her advice was this: “No woman who is of child bearing age should take the experimental vaccines!”
I wish that I had saved it. It was filmed in early 2021.
Ping for later
Bkmk
Bill Gates is ecstatic.
Considering that pregnant women are advised against eating sushi and some types of cheese, I’m not entirely sure this is groundbreaking, especially as the article seems to indicate that the actual sample size was 127, not even 1000?
I’m by no means a “shill” but nobody I know who has been vaccinated has had any adverse reactions. Babies are still being born. I understand why people are distrustful of the CDC, et al, but the evidence of my own eyes, while anecdotal, aligns with the party line thus far. We’ll see what happens in the next few years but as of now those predicting that the sky will fall haven’t proven their case.
Just one of the many wonderful things that the jabs were meant to do. Don’t you love it when a plan comes together? (Half sarcasm, half truth.)
Am I in before the Vax Nazis?
How does Planned Parenthood feel about this?
“It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.”
What a great idea... These are real humanitarians! 104 dead babies out of 127 pregnancies. That is just not enough to establish a trend. Why not find a thousand more pregnant lady volunteers and sacrifice at the current rate just 819 more babies? Why didn’t Bill Gates think of it? It is all for science.
Just sickening.
Just evil for ANYONE to advocate that pregnant women take these dangerous shots.
Dems, RINOS and CINOS here will attack you just as they attack on the other threads that show this is all a scamdemic, a plandemic, or when Fauci is being exposed yet again.
I hate to think this but maybe this”Vaccine” was designed from the start as a population reducer.
Its certainly doing the job better than the ChiCom Bioweapon its supposed to treat.
If I read the actual paper correctly, the study is a snapshot of time, December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Within that (arbitrary?) time-window, from a total vaccinated sample of 3958 women, 827 women had their pregnancies end in one manner or another.
The 827 completed pregnancies includes 115 miscarriages/stillbirth. All of these are from the larger group of 3958.
It so happens that the ratio of successful/unsuccessful pregnancies reported in their chosen time-window is generally “normal”. However, that they managed to capture 700 women who didn’t even get the shot until the third term makes me wonder if they did some custom fitting of their study time-window, to possibly hide something disturbing.
I’d rather know the eventual outcome for all 3958 women before drawing any conclusions.
This report was posted on FR quite a while ago. I don’t care for their presentation, but I also think the critique is a bit lacking.
From the study: “. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester).
Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported.
Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases)”
Found in the conclusions section:
“However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.”
Data was collected from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, which means that some women’s full term delivery may not happen until October or November. The study was EPublished in April-when the fate of the majority of the 3958 pregnancies was unknown.
They do note that most of the live births were for the people given shots in the third trimester. And they note that further study of those vaccinated early in pregnancy are needed.
So of the 3958 followed in V-safe, we only know the outcome of 827, which leaves 3131 as unknown. How many of those were 1st or 2cd trimester? What has since transpired?
The study also notes that this result is comparable to other studies done which involved pregnant women - but we have also do not know from what is presented here, what those studies involved.
Bottom line is that it is clear that if you are going to risk this shot, best do it in third trimester, but we didn’t really need a study to tell us that-did we?
And we won’t know the final statistics of the impact of the shot in early pregnancy vs late stages, unless someone completes the follow up on the rest of the 3958.
Additionally it was noted that 35,691 were reported as pregnant when looking at more than V-safe. We have no reporting on those at all.
This is just plain wrong. The people who wrote this article didn’t read the source.. just went crazy and got things backward. 20% abortion rate isn’t acceptable to anyone so.. the actual report is a nightmare... but being just wrong blows credibility.