Posted on 08/10/2021 9:03:58 AM PDT by hoagy62
Pushback is growing against Gov. Jay Inslee's new order mandating that all state employees, healthcare and long-term care workers get the COVID-19 vaccine.
Under the governor's order, issued Monday, those workers must submit proof that they have been vaccinated against the virus by Oct. 18 - or else.
The new mandate applies to 400,000 healthcare workers in Washington state and comes amid a fifth wave of COVID-19, as the highly contagious delta variant drives up cases and fills up hospital beds. The governor's order does include exemptions for medical or religious reasons.
Robin Dale with the Washington Health Care Association says they've been pushing for this new mandate for months.
(snip)
While Democratic lawmakers call the mandate an important step in stopping the virus, many Republicans disagree.
"I’m just concerned that this goes too far - and what if this doesn’t work? What’s next?" says state Sen. Mike Padden, R-Spokane Valley. "I mean, are they going to strap people to gurneys and force shots into their bodies?"
(Excerpt) Read more at komonews.com ...
“20 something guys doing cross fit and three days later on a vent is scary stuff.”
YEAH, and that is after taking the “vaccine” !
No that was in Arkansas. Very low vaccination rates.
Btw, not to worry because apparently all vaxxed folk will have their 5 g kick in tomorrow and be microwaved.
So says a famous Dutch guy.
And to think I have no chocolate in the house...
Yes. I am seriously suggesting that you been sold a pack of lies.
Four months ago.
How many deaths enough for you and FauxiMengleGates ?
“...sold a pack of lies.”
Yep, that’s what Zuckerface, HoChiJack and valley girl Gwen keep saying: When will you peasants just believe what we say, shut up, and do what you’re told.
Or a similar database in Europe:
I'm part of the CONTROL GROUP of this experiment. You do know why any experiment needs a control group, don't you? As a presumed naturally immune person, what would be the greater odds of survival; taking the 'jab' and developing hitherto unknown 'side effects', like death? The 'jabbed' are spreaders. Adding a second immunity system (DNA) into our bodies sets up a conflict between the 2 immunity systems, so there's a disadvantage to taking the 'jab' to a naturally immune person. And since we weren't warned about the reality that is slowly being revealed, because we don't do autopsies),how can you possibly justify the callousness of the 'vaxxers' trying to destroy our 'control group'? Get rational. Try addressing the facts stated in my first post to you with facts of your own.
.... If everyone now has to wear a mask because everyone is now back to being suspected asymptomatic carriers, why get the vaccine at all?....there are treatments now that were unavailable before so I would imagine a treatment option is far better ‘risk’ than a so called vaccine that’s being proved definitely causing reactions for many...and very serious ones.
I was just sent a corporate email...mandating proof of vaccinations by Oct. 4th or be prepared to undergo regular testing, masks and social distancing for unvaxxed.
Email read, “vaccinations not required for employment at this time.”
Reading between the lines. Not required YET
So, if hospital workers refuse the jab, they will be fired.
Meanwhile, we are being told that hospitals are overrun with covid patients.
Does anyone else see the logic flaw with all of this? Would not firing hospital workers from hospitals overrun with covid patients make the overrun more of a problem? If, say, 20% refuse and are fired, who will pick up the workload?
This is another proof point that this is about control, and not about health,
...so many Junior Stasi lurking around here on FR...
________________________________________
Someone close to me who does not post here, but who will occasionally read posts, told me today that “FR has become worthless with so many posts that not only do not get it, but shill for the tyrants.”
...to disclose to everyone who receives an experimental treatment that these can’t be compelled and must be taken voluntarily.
________________________________
So, what applies to an authorized treatment with known sequelae? Can these still be compelled? Can they be refused?
mRNA injections aside, we _know_ the pharm industry covered up adverse reactions to the MMR (autism, especially in minority male children) and those are required for school and other venues.
No one will come out and say just what the injections do to the immune systems of the recovered, yet they will also fall under the mandates.
DH & I each cleared a symptomatic case. We have not been otherwise ill in the past 19 months. We are retired and, if it comes to denying grocery store access, we are prepped well.
I do not accept that the adverse reporting systems of the US, the EU and the UK are all inconsequential. All of them, which are government-backed, admit they undercount the reactions/deaths. Pre-clown-world, 60% vaccinated plus the recovered would constitute herd immunity. Long haul Covid is sobering and yet, the injections appear to create the exact same reactions.
The entire gene-therapy platform is not working. It may work for genetic illness and maybe some cancers, but it is failing for coronavirus.
Would not firing hospital workers from hospitals overrun with covid patients make the overrun more of a problem? If, say, 20% refuse and are fired, who will pick up the workload?
______________________________________
Have seriously heard that there are foreign-trained and newly graduated nurses (and perhaps other health care professionals) on tap to replace those walking out or being fired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.