[grey_whiskers]

The difference is that the "man scoffed at Covid then contracted Covid and Died" are *officially* promoted by those who stand to make $$$$ off the jabs.

The "vaccination proponent gets jab and dies" are coming from the grass roots, and are being *suppressed*.

Which one is more likely to be propaganda?

(Who are the big pockets behind each one? The "Center For Countering Digital Hate" (privately funded, by who?) likes to say that the "Disinformation Dozen" made -- get this -- $26 million selling things online last year.

Pfizer alone projects $33 BILLION in jab revenues.

Remember, the government is picking our pockets to pay for it, and is chomping at the bit to make it mandatory.

[ifinnegan]

“Which one is more likely to be propaganda”

Both. As I said they’re morality plays.

The Covud fearmongers have more power and the bigger platform for sure. They are more dangerous because of that - danger in terms of destroying the nation, implementing totalitarianism etc...they’re deep state.