Posted on 08/07/2021 5:44:49 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
There is no such thing as 97% consensus. If 3 out of 100 researchers strongly disagree, it is NOT consensus. History has vindicated the small minority who have made the most significant discoveries. Often at risk of their good names and careers
Well then pull Fauci’s license.
So if they don’t give a doctors assessment/recommendation, or they don’t lie for the politburo they lose their license.
SOOOOOOOOOOO—The politicians can lie all they wish, and the DOCTORS are going to be punished for telling us the truth????
What the hell has happened in the USA???
I trust a person with YEARS of medical knowledge much more than a politician-—who will lie about anything & everything to hold power. MY Mobile Vet has 6 years +++ of medical training & about 35 years of mobile large animal practice.
I trust her FAR more than anything from Biden or Fauci.
They certainly are pushing us into a shooting war.
They’ve been doing the same with climate science and academics for years.
It’s only natural that they’ve extended their oppression and censorship to this.
Why should doctors be in MORE danger for spreading this “misinformation” than spreading other misinformation? Does this not infer that it’s been OK and actually approved for doctors to spread misinformation before?
Who decides which information is misinformation?
I seem to recall the Left saying there is no such thing as objective truth. What happened to that?
Same kind of oppression could easily be applied to the specialized field of law. Citizen oversight is next to impossible.
Larry Sanger [Wikipedia co-founder] The Astonishing Hubris Of A Global Experimental Vaccine
FRIDAY, AUG 06, 2021
“Never in the history of the world has there been a global push to administer an experimental medicine to all of humanity, billions of us, at the same time.
I want you to stop and reflect on that. Imagine the hubris it required both to carry out this plan and to propagandize the world to carry it out.
“Hubris?” you ask. “What do you mean?”
[read it all at the link]
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/larry-sanger-astonishing-hubris-global-experimental-vaccine
In addition:
The basis for scientific research is that there are almost no absolutes. Everything is subject to re-examination to determine if accepted “facts” are correct.
To deny this is to risk a return to the modern version of the dark ages.
And Trump’s opportunity to come clean on his own ignorance wanes with the effectiveness of these shots.
Maybe doctors who get “unlicensed” can advertize that fact. I would be all too happy to visit them for consultations about my health and write them a check.
Just ask Dr. Mercola, who was chased around his neighborhood by a CNN harpy recently...
Does that include saying mRNA is safe?
Practice medicine w/o a license...go to jail.
Nina Teicholz* realized that doctors and medical researchers have not been allowed to voice independent opinions for at least the past 50 years.
And it ALL comes down to our government. If government says that fat is bad and carbs are good (which all the evidence now says is wrong), then literally EVERYONE will ‘agree’, as researchers who don’t ‘agree’ lose their grants or, for doctors, expose themselves (and their medical groups) to massive liability.
In other words, as long as you can say “I was just following (government) orders” you’re ok, and protected. Sound familiar?
*if you don’t know who Nina Teichholz is, look her up, they haven’t (yet) pulled her videos.
Censorship destroys trust.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.